The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The correlation and prediction of the solubility of compounds in water using an amended solvation energy relationship
Abstract
The aqueous solubility of liquids and solids, as log S(W), has been correlated with an amended solvation equation that incorporates a term in Sigma alpha(2)(H) x Sigma beta(2)(H), where the latter are the hydrogen bond acidity and basicity of the solutes, respectively. Application to a training set of 594 compounds led to a correlation equation with a standard deviation, SD, of 0.56 log units. For a test set of 65 compounds, the SD was 0.50 log units, and for a combined correlation equation for 659 compounds, the SD was 0.56 log units. The correlation equations enable the factors that influence aqueous solubility to be revealed. The hydrogen-bond propensity of a compound always leads to an increase in solubility, even though the Sigma alpha(2)(H) x Sigma beta(2)(H) term opposes solubility due to interactions in the liquid or solid. Increase in solute dipolarity/polarizability increases solubility, whereas an increase in solute excess molar refraction, and especially, volume decrease solubility. The solubility of Bronsted acids and bases is discussed, and corrections for the fraction of neutral species in the saturated solution are graphically presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prediction of drug solubility from structure
Jorgensen, W. L., & Duffy, E. M. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00008-x · Cited by 891
Theoretical Methods for the Description of the Solvent Effect in Biomolecular Systems
Orozco, M., & Luque, F. J. (2000) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990052a · Cited by 622
Physicochemical Profiling (Solubility, Permeability and Charge State)
Avdeef, A. (2001) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/1568026013395100 · Cited by 587
Random Forest Models To Predict Aqueous Solubility
Palmer, D. S., O'Boyle, N. M., Glen, R. C., & Mitchell, J. B. O. (2007) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci060164k · Cited by 364
Applications of Polyparameter Linear Free Energy Relationships in Environmental Chemistry
Endo, S., & Goss, K.-U. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es503369t · Cited by 302
Glomme, A., März, J., & Dressman, J. B. (2005) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.20212 · Cited by 295
Separation methods for estimating octanol–water partition coefficients
Poole, S. K., & Poole, C. F. (2003) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.08.032 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, M. H., & Le, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 868-880
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080242559
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.