The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Extended Charge Equilibration Method
Abstract
We present a method for estimating partial atomic charges that uses all of the measured ionization energies (first, second, third, etc.) for every atom in the periodic table. We build on the charge equilibration (Qeq) method of Rappé and Goddard (which used only the first ionization energies) but reduce the number of ad hoc parameters from at least one for every type of atom to just two global parameters: a dielectric strength and a modified parameter for hydrogen atoms. Periodic electrostatic interactions are calculated via Ewald sums, and the partial charges are determined by simultaneously solving a system of linear equations; no iteration is required. We compare the predicted partial atomic charges of this extended charge equilibration (EQeq) scheme against plane-wave density-functional theory derived charges determined via the REPEAT method for 12 diverse metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). We also compare EQeq charges against ChelpG charges calculated using nonperiodic MOF fragments, as well as against Qeq charges as implemented in Accelrys Materials Studio. We demonstrate that for the purpose of ranking MOFs from best to worst for carbon capture applications, EQeq charges perform as well as charges derived from electrostatic potentials, but EQeq requires only a tiny fraction of the computational cost (seconds vs days for the MOFs studied). The source code for the EQeq algorithm is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Four Generations of High-Dimensional Neural Network Potentials
Behler, J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00868 · Cited by 873
Understanding the diversity of the metal-organic framework ecosystem
Moosavi, S. M., Nandy, A., Jablonka, K. M., Ongari, D., Janet, J. P., Boyd, P. G., Lee, Y., Smit, B., & Kulik, H. J. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17755-8 · Cited by 622
High-throughput computational screening of metal–organic frameworks
Colón, Y. J., & Snurr, R. Q. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00070f · Cited by 470
Self-citationOn the inner workings of Monte Carlo codes
Dubbeldam, D., Torres-Knoop, A., & Walton, K. S. (2013) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2013.819102 · Cited by 422
Structure–property relationships of porous materials for carbon dioxide separation and capture
Wilmer, C. E., Farha, O. K., Bae, Y.-S., Hupp, J. T., & Snurr, R. Q. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee23201d · Cited by 388
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilmer, C. E., Kim, K. C., & Snurr, R. Q.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-08-24
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2506-2511
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2316446502
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Extended Charge Equilibration Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jz3008485
- The paper
- Wilmer, C. E., Kim, K. C., & Snurr, R. Q. (2012). An Extended Charge Equilibration Method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz3008485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.