Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mesoscopic Simulation of Polymer−Surfactant Aggregation

Groot, Robert D.·2000·Langmuir

Abstract

The formation of a polymer−surfactant complex has been studied in bulk solution using dissipative particle dynamics simulation of a system containing polymer, surfactant, and water. Widom insertion is used to obtain the surfactant chemical potential. Two distinct modes of surfactant adsorption on the polymer have been observed, depending on the interaction mechanism. These are (a) continuous adsorption and (b) polymer−surfactant aggregation via discrete micelles. If the binding between polymer and surfactant is dominated by hydrophobic interaction (i.e., when the surfactant tails tend to adsorb on the polymer), continuous adsorption is found, leading to molecular bottlebrush or swollen cage conformations. If the binding between polymer and surfactant is dominated by the surfactant headgroup s, micellar adsorption is found, leading to a necklace of micelles on a polymer backbone. For each interaction strength between polymer and surfactant headgroup, there is an interaction between polymer and surfactant tail where the mode of adsorption crosses over from micelle adsorption to molecular bottlebrush conformations. This crossover is comparable to a critical point in the condensation of gases to liquids. A schematic phase diagram indicating where the various adsorption modes occur is given. The polymer endpoint separation as well as its swelling exponent are found to pass through a minimum as the surfactant concentration is increased. When the bulk critical micelle concentration is reached, the polymer swells beyond its original size.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la000010d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Groot, R. D.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2000-08-25
Volume
16
Issue
19
Pages
7493-7502
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2126556989
Cited by
265
References
0
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.