Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrocatalytic Pathways on Carbon-Supported Platinum Nanoparticles: Comparison of Particle-Size-Dependent Rates of Methanol, Formic Acid, and Formaldehyde Electrooxidation

Park, Sungho, Xie, Yong, Weaver, Michael J.·2002·Langmuir
DOI 10.1021/la0200459
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The voltammetric electrooxidation rates of formic acid, formaldehyde, and methanol in acidic electrolyte on carbon-supported platinum nanoparticle films with varying particle diameters ( d ) in the range of ca. 2−9 nm are examined with the objective of comparing the nanoparticle size sensitivity for these related yet distinct electrocatalytic processes. The reaction rates on the larger nanoparticles ( d > 4 nm) are similar to those observed on polycrystalline Pt when normalized to the same microscopic Pt surface area. As noted previously, the rates of methanol electrooxidation decrease for Pt nanoparticle diameters below 4 nm. However, formic acid electrooxidation exhibits the opposite behavior, with rates increasing markedly for d < 4 nm, while formaldehyde electrooxidation displays little sensitivity to the Pt nanoparticle size. However, the extent of chemisorbed CO formation from all three reactants, as deduced from voltammetric and infrared spectral data, diminishes with decreasing d, the CO coverages for a given nanoparticle size being in the order methanol < formic acid < formaldehyde. These nanoparticle-size-dependent electrocatalytic and CO adsorptive findings are consistent with the occurrence of a Pt site “ensemble effect”, where reactant dehydrogenation to form CO, and also in the case of formaldehyde and especially methanol to yield the reactive intermediate en route to CO 2 production, is impeded by the sharply decreasing availability of contiguous Pt terrace sites for d < 4 nm. This structural model is consistent with infrared measurements using CO as a nanoparticle structural probe, which show a rapidly decreasing proportion of terrace relative to edge Pt sites for d < 4 nm, in harmony with atomic packing considerations. The markedly enhanced electrocatalyic rates for formic acid oxidation on the smaller nanoparticles are attributed to the lack of a “Pt site ensemble” requirement for this process, coupled with decreased CO poisoning: unlike the other two reactions, oxygen addition (from coadsorbed −OH) is not necessarily required in order to produce CO 2 from formic acid.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la0200459

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Park, S., Xie, Y., & Weaver, M. J.
Venue
Langmuir
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2002-06-19
Volume
18
Issue
15
Pages
5792-5798
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
DOI
10.1021/la0200459
OpenAlex
W2088300896
Cited by
403
References
17
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.