The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Translational and Rotational Dynamics of Rodlike Cellulose Whiskers
Abstract
The dynamic properties of suspensions of rodlike cellulose microcrystallites (whiskers) are investigated using polarized and depolarized dynamic light scattering (DLS, DDLS) and transient electric birefringence (TEB). The whiskers were prepared by controlled sulfuric acid hydrolysis from cotton and tunicate cellulose fibers. Translational ( D ) and rotational ( ϑ ) diffusion coefficients in dilute suspensions were measured. For the cotton system, D = 5.5 × 10 - 8 cm 2 /s, ϑ DDLS = 552 s - 1, and ϑ TEB = 536 s - 1 . With the use of Broersma's relations, the rotational and translational diffusion coefficients lead to values of the length L = 255 nm and the cross-section diameter d = 15 nm. For the tunicate-derived whiskers, D = 1.5 × 10 - 8 cm 2 /s, ϑ DDLS = 11 s - 1, and ϑ TEB = 14 s - 1 . These values and Broersma's relations give L = 1160 nm and d = 16 nm. The DDLS and TEB techniques are in good agreement for the rotational diffusion coefficients, especially for the cotton whiskers. These results provide validation for using DDLS to study the dynamics of cellulose whisker systems in both simple suspensions and complex environments. Cellulose whiskers may thus be used as model rigid rods dispersible in aqueous suspensions the structure and dynamics of which may be readily studied by widely available techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose
DONG, X. M., REVOL, J.-F., & GRAY, D. G. (1998) · Cellulose · doi:10.1023/a:1009260511939 · Cited by 1,032
Polysaccharide Microcrystals Reinforced Amorphous Poly(β-hydroxyoctanoate) Nanocomposite Materials
Dubief, D., Samain, E., & Dufresne, A. (1999) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma990274a · Cited by 259
Cited by
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications
Brinchi, L., Cotana, F., Fortunati, E., & Kenny, J. M. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033 · Cited by 1,121
Rosa, M. F., Medeiros, E. S., Malmonge, J. A., Gregorski, K. S., Wood, D. F., Mattoso, L. H. C., Glenn, G., Orts, W. J., & Imam, S. H. (2010) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059 · Cited by 1,099
Elastic modulus and stress-transfer properties of tunicate cellulose whiskers
Šturcová, A., Davies, G. R., & Eichhorn, S. J. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049291k · Cited by 953
Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: Structure, properties and applications
de Souza Lima, M. M., & Borsali, R. (2004) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200300268 · Cited by 894
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- De Souza Lima, M. M., Wong, J. T., Paillet, M., Borsali, R., & Pecora, R.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-12-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-29
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W1999276661
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translational and Rotational Dynamics of Rodlike Cellulose Whiskers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la020475z
- The paper
- De Souza Lima, M. M., Wong, J. T., Paillet, M., Borsali, R., & Pecora, R. (2003). Translational and Rotational Dynamics of Rodlike Cellulose Whiskers. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la020475z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.