The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surface Engineering with Poly(ethylene glycol) Photolithography to Create High-Density Cell Arrays on Glass
Abstract
This manuscript presents a microfabrication-derived approach for controlling mammalian cell−surface interactions. Poly(ethylene glycol)-diacrylate (PEG-DA) was patterned, in a process analogous to photolithography, to manufacture high-density arrays of micrometer-scale PEG hydrogel wells on glass. Individual wells consisted of PEG walls and glass attachment pads; thus, as a result of the biological inertness of PEG, microwell patterning created a highly ordered biointerface with modulating-cell or protein-repellent properties. Fabricated hydrogel microstrucures proved very effective in guiding and confining adhesion of transformed 3T3 fibroblasts and primary rat hepatocytes to defined regions on the glass substrate. PEG-patterned glass surfaces were selectively modified with collagen (type I) to induce hepatocyte attachment. Localization of the fluorescein-conjugated collagen within the glass attachment pads of PEG hydrogel microwells was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Further surface analysis was performed by tapping mode atomic force microscopy conducted within individual PEG wells. Protein-modified regions inside the wells had a root-mean-square roughness of 1.13 ± 0.03 nm compared to 0.7 ± 0.04 nm for alkylsilane-treated regions lacking protein. The cell occupancy of 96.7 ± 1.9% within the arrays of 30 × 30 μm individual wells was demonstrated for 3T3 fibroblasts. At the same time, cells remained effectively isolated in the individual PEG microwells. Primary hepatocytes attached and became fully confluent within the collagen-coated PEG after 24 h of incubation. Each 30 × 30 μm well contained one to three hepatocytes. Cells patterned on the surface remained viable after 24 h of incubation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The trk Proto-Oncogene Product: a Signal Transducing Receptor for Nerve Growth Factor
Kaplan, D. R., Hempstead, B. L., Martin-Zanca, D., Chao, M. V., & Parada, L. F. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1850549 · Cited by 1,379
Cited by
Patterning surfaces with functional polymers
Nie, Z., & Kumacheva, E. (2008) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2109 · Cited by 935
Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell–substrate interface
Nikkhah, M., Edalat, F., Manoucheri, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.079 · Cited by 640
Toner, M., & Irimia, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.011205.135108 · Cited by 623
Self-citationLarge-Scale Single-Cell Trapping And Imaging Using Microwell Arrays
Rettig, J. R., & Folch, A. (2005) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0505977 · Cited by 502
Microfluidics technology for manipulation and analysis of biological cells
Yi, C., Li, C.-W., Ji, S., & Yang, M. (2006) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.037 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Revzin, A., Tompkins, R. G., & Toner, M.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-10-08
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 9855-9862
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2079960458
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.