The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Magnetic Alignment of the Chiral Nematic Phase of a Cellulose Microfibril Suspension
Abstract
Stable suspensions of tunicate cellulose microfibrils were prepared by acid hydrolysis of the cellulosic mantles of tunicin. They formed a chiral nematic phase above a critical concentration. External magnetic fields were applied to the chiral nematic phase in two different manners to control its phase structure. (i) Static magnetic fields ranging 1-28 T were used to align the chiral nematic axis (helical axis) in the field direction. (ii) A rotating magnetic field (5 T, 10 rpm) was applied to unwind the helices and to form a nematic phase. These phenomena were interpreted in terms of the anisotropic diamagnetic susceptibility of the cellulose microfibril. The diamagnetic susceptibility of the microfibril is smaller in the direction parallel (chi( parallel)) to the fiber axis than in the direction perpendicular (chi( perpendicular)) to the fiber axis, that is, chi( parallel) < chi( perpendicular) < 0. Because the helical axis coincides with the direction normal ( perpendicular) to the fiber axis, the helical axis aligned parallel to the applied field. On the other hand, the rotating magnetic field induced the uniaxial alignment of the smallest susceptibility axis, that is, chi( parallel) in the present case, and brought about unwinding of the helices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications
Habibi, Y., Lucia, L. A., & Rojas, O. J. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900339w · Cited by 5,980
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., & Dorris, A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001273 · Cited by 4,465
Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications
Brinchi, L., Cotana, F., Fortunati, E., & Kenny, J. M. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033 · Cited by 1,121
Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review
(2008) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.3.3.929-980 · Cited by 901
Peng, B. L., Dhar, N., Liu, H. L., & Tam, K. C. (2011) · The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cjce.20554 · Cited by 890
Nanofibrils in nature and materials engineering
Ling, S., Kaplan, D. L., & Buehler, M. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2018.16 · Cited by 730
Kaushik, M., & Moores, A. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c5gc02500a · Cited by 606
Yao, K., Meng, Q., Bulone, V., & Zhou, Q. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201701323 · Cited by 462
Understanding the Self‐Assembly of Cellulose Nanocrystals—Toward Chiral Photonic Materials
Tran, A., Boott, C. E., & MacLachlan, M. J. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201905876 · Cited by 320
pH-Responsive Cellulose Nanocrystal Gels and Nanocomposites
Way, A. E., Hsu, L., Shanmuganathan, K., Weder, C., & Rowan, S. J. (2012) · ACS Macro Letters · doi:10.1021/mz3003006 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Kimura, F., Kimura, T., Tamura, M., Hirai, A., Ikuno, M., & Horii, F.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-01-22
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2034-2037
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2025619220
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.