Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gold Nanoparticle−Cytochrome c Complexes: The Effect of Nanoparticle Ligand Charge on Protein Structure

Aubin-Tam, Marie-Eve, Hamad-Schifferli, Kimberly·2005·Langmuir

Abstract

We report the effect of nanoparticle ligand charge on the structure of a covalently, site-specifically linked protein. Au nanoparticles with positive, negative, and neutral ligands were appended to a specific cysteine, C102, of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytochrome c. Conjugates were purified by HPLC or gel electrophoresis. Circular dichroism spectroscopy shows that changing the nanoparticle ligand dramatically influences the attached cytochrome c structure. The protein retains its structure with neutral ligands but denatures in the presence of charged species. This is rationalized by the electrostatic interaction of amino acids in the local vicinity of C102 with the endgroups of the ligand.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la052102e

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Aubin-Tam, M.-E., & Hamad-Schifferli, K.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2005-11-12
Volume
21
Issue
26
Pages
12080-12084
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2024607041
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.