The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence of a Unique Electron Donor−Acceptor Property for Platinum Nanoparticles as Studied by XPS
Abstract
In the interaction of PVP with Pt nanoparticles <7 nm in size, charge transfer is from carbonyl groups in PVP to Pt nanoparticles, whereas in the interaction of PVP with bulk Pt or Pt nanoparticles >25 nm in size, charge transfer is from Pt metal to the polymer side chain of PVP. There exists a critical nanoparticle size between 7 and 25 nm that would lead to a switch in the electron donor-acceptor property.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Photoemission from mass-selected monodispersed Pt clusters
Eberhardt, W., Fayet, P., Cox, D. M., Fu, Z., Kaldor, A., Sherwood, R., & Sondericker, D. (1990) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.780 · Cited by 284
Cited by
Nonscalable Oxidation Catalysis of Gold Clusters
Yamazoe, S., Koyasu, K., & Tsukuda, T. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400209a · Cited by 607
Safo, I. A., Werheid, M., Dosche, C., & Oezaslan, M. (2019) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/c9na00186g · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiu, L., Liu, F., Zhao, L., Yang, W., & Yao, J.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-04-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4480-4482
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2024498209
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
