Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 312

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon Nanotubes Contain Residual Metal Catalyst Nanoparticles even after Washing with Nitric Acid at Elevated Temperature Because These Metal Nanoparticles Are Sheathed by Several Graphene Sheets

Pumera, Martin·2007·Langmuir

Abstract

It is demonstrated that multiwalled (MWCNT) and single-walled (SWCNT) carbon nanotube materials contain residual metal impurities (Fe, Ni, Co, Mo) even after prolonged periods of "washing" with concentrated nitric acid at temperature of 80 degrees C. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) reveals that this is because such metal impurities are intercalated in the nanotube channel (in the case of MWCNT) or in the "bamboo" segment of the nanotube (in the case of "bamboo"-like MWCNT), or they create graphene sheet protected metal core/shell nanoparticles (in the case of SWCNT). TEM/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (TEM/EDS) elucidate that residual metal impurities presented in "washed" carbon nanotube materials are in some cases in the form of metal alloys or that there can be several different pure metal nanoparticles presented in one CNT material. It is shown by thermogravimetric analysis that "washing" with concentrated nitric acid removes up to 88% (w/w) of metal catalyst nanoparticles from as-received carbon nanotubes and that such removal has in some cases a significant effect on the electrochemical reduction of hydrogen peroxide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la070088v

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 312

Metadata

Authors
Pumera, M.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2007-04-25
Volume
23
Issue
11
Pages
6453-6458
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2046977663
Cited by
312
References
1
FWCI
11.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.