Cited by 640Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesAdvanced Battery Technologies Research

Differentiating Contributions to “Ion Transfer” Barrier from Interphasial Resistance and Li + Desolvation at Electrolyte/Graphite Interface

Xu, Kang, von Cresce, Arthur, Lee, Unchul·2010·Langmuir

Abstract

Efforts were made to differentiate the contributions to the so-called "ion transfer" barrier at the electrolyte/graphite junction from two distinct processes: (1) desolvation of Li(+) before it enters graphene interlayer and (2) the subsequent migration of bare Li(+) through the ad hoc interphase. By leveraging a scenario where no substantial interphase was formed on Li(+) intercalation hosts, we were able to quantify the distribution of "ion transfer" activation energy between these two interfacial processes and hence identify the desolvation process of Li(+) as the major energy-consuming step. The result confirmed the earlier belief that the rate-determining step in the charging of a graphitic anode in Li(+) intercalation chemistry relates to the stripping of solvation sheath of Li(+), which is closely interwoven with the interphasial resistance to Li(+) migration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la1009994

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Desolvation is identified as the most sluggish step with the highest energy barrier in many Li+ charge transfer systems.

    “During the whole charge transfer process, desolvation is identified to be the most sluggish step with the highest energy barrier to be overcome in many systems.”
  • The desolvation process has an energy barrier of 50-70 kJ mol-1 and greatly limits fast charging and low-temperature electrochemical performance.

    “This kinetically limited process with an energy barrier of 50-70 kJ mol -1 [10] greatly limits fast charging and LT electrochemical performance.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, K., von Cresce, A., & Lee, U.
Affiliations
  • DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory (US)
  • Electrochemistry Branch, Power and Energy Division
  • Infrared Materials Branch, Electro-optics and Photonics Division Sensor and Electron Devices Directorate
Corresponding author
Xu, Kang
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2010-05-06
Volume
26
Issue
13
Pages
11538-11543
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2080724557
Cited by
640
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 14
FWCI
7.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Langmuir (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Keywords
lithium desolvation, lithium intercalation, graphene interlayer, activation energy, rate-determining step, solvation structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review