The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Superhydrophobic Surfaces Best for Icephobicity?
Open accessAbstract
Ice formation can have catastrophic consequences for human activity on the ground and in the air. Here we investigate water freezing delays on untreated and coated surfaces ranging from hydrophilic to superhydrophobic and use these delays to evaluate icephobicity. Supercooled water microdroplets are inkjet-deposited and coalesce until spontaneous freezing of the accumulated mass occurs. Surfaces with nanometer-scale roughness and higher wettability display unexpectedly long freezing delays, at least 1 order of magnitude longer than typical superhydrophobic surfaces with larger hierarchical roughness and low wettability. Directly related to the main focus on heterogeneous nucleation and freezing delay of supercooled water droplets, the observed ensuing crystallization process consisted of two distinct phases: one very rapid recalescent partial solidification phase and a subsequent slower phase. Observations of the droplet collision process employed for the continuous liquid mass accumulation up to the point of ice formation reveal a previously unseen atmospheric-pressure, subfreezing-temperature regime for liquid-on-liquid bounce. On the basis of the entropy reduction of water near a solid surface, we formulate a modification to the classical heterogeneous nucleation theory, which predicts the observed freezing delay trends. Our results bring to question recent emphasis on super water-repellent surface formulations for ice formation retardation and suggest that anti-icing design must optimize the competing influences of both wettability and roughness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regimes of coalescence and separation in droplet collision
QIAN, J., & LAW, C. K. (1997) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112096003722 · Cited by 841
Nanbu, K. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · doi:10.1109/27.887765 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Bioinspired Surfaces with Superwettability: New Insight on Theory, Design, and Applications
Wang, S., Liu, K., Yao, X., & Jiang, L. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400083y · Cited by 1,646
Design of anti-icing surfaces: smooth, textured or slippery?
Kreder, M. J., Alvarenga, J., Kim, P., & Aizenberg, J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.3 · Cited by 1,505
Liquid-Infused Nanostructured Surfaces with Extreme Anti-Ice and Anti-Frost Performance
Kim, P., Wong, T.-S., Alvarenga, J., Kreder, M. J., Adorno-Martinez, W. E., & Aizenberg, J. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn302310q · Cited by 1,316
Mechanism of supercooled droplet freezing on surfaces
Jung, S., Tiwari, M. K., Doan, N. V., & Poulikakos, D. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1630 · Cited by 769
Self-citationDesigning durable icephobic surfaces
Golovin, K., Kobaku, S. P. R., Lee, D. H., DiLoreto, E. T., Mabry, J. M., & Tuteja, A. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501496 · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, S., Dorrestijn, M., Raps, D., Das, A., Megaridis, C. M., & Poulikakos, D.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-02-14
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3059-3066
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2313341540
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 58.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.