The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dissolution of ZnO Nanoparticles at Circumneutral pH: A Study of Size Effects in the Presence and Absence of Citric Acid
Abstract
Understanding size-dependent processes, including dissolution, of engineered nanoparticles is essential in addressing the potential environmental and health impacts of these materials as well as their long-term stability. In this study, experimental measurements of size-dependent dissolution of well-characterized zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles with particle diameters in the range of 4 to 130 nm have been measured at circumneutral pH (pH 7.5) and compared. Dissolution was found to be enhanced with smaller ZnO nanoparticles compared to larger-sized particles, even though the nanoparticles were present in solution as aggregates with hydrodynamic diameters on the order of 1-3 μm in size. The presence of citric acid significantly enhanced the extent of ZnO dissolution for all sizes, and the greatest enhancement was observed for the 4 nm particles. Although these results are found to be in qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions, a linearized form of the Kelvin equation to calculate a surface free energy yielded quantities inconsistent with expected values from the literature. Reasons for this inconsistency are discussed and include potential deviations of solubility behavior from classical thermodynamics as a result of a lack of detailed knowledge of surface structure and surface properties, including the presence of different surface crystal facets, and the aggregation state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brunner, T. J., Wick, P., Manser, P., Spohn, P., Grass, R. N., Limbach, L. K., Bruinink, A., & Stark, W. J. (2006) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es052069i · Cited by 1,385
Cited by
Ecotoxicity of manufactured ZnO nanoparticles – A review
Ma, H., Williams, P. L., & Diamond, S. A. (2013) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2012.08.011 · Cited by 910
Extracellular synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticle using seaweeds of gulf of Mannar, India
Nagarajan, S., & Arumugam Kuppusamy, K. (2013) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-11-39 · Cited by 454
Transient, Biocompatible Electronics and Energy Harvesters Based on ZnO
Dagdeviren, C., Hwang, S., Su, Y., Kim, S., Cheng, H., Gur, O., Haney, R., Omenetto, F. G., Huang, Y., & Rogers, J. A. (2013) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201300146 · Cited by 412
Ma, R., Levard, C., Judy, J. D., Unrine, J. M., Durenkamp, M., Martin, B., Jefferson, B., & Lowry, G. V. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es403646x · Cited by 373
Modeling Nanomaterial Environmental Fate in Aquatic Systems
Dale, A. L., Casman, E. A., Lowry, G. V., Lead, J. R., Viparelli, E., & Baalousha, M. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es505076w · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Mudunkotuwa, I. A., Rupasinghe, T., Wu, C.-M., & Grassian, V. H.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-12-15
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 396-403
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2004874639
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.