The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thermodynamic Characterization of Polypeptide Complex Coacervation
Abstract
The interactions between a series of oppositely charged polypeptide pairs are probed using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) in combination with turbidity measurements and optical microscopy. Polypeptide complex coacervation is described as a sequence of two distinct binding steps using an empirical extension of a simple ITC binding model. The first step consists of the formation of soluble complexes from oppositely charged polypeptides (ion pairing), which in turn aggregate into insoluble interpolymer complexes in the second step (complex coacervation). Polypeptides have identical backbones and differ only in their charged side groups, making them attractive model systems for this work. The poly(l-ornithine hydrobromide) (PO)/poly(l-glutamic acid sodium salt) (PGlu) system is used to examine the effects of parameters such as the salt concentration, pH, temperature, degree of polymerization, and total polymer concentration on the thermodynamic characteristics of complexation. Complex coacervation in all probed systems is found to be endothermic, essentially an entropy-driven processes. Increasing the screening effect of the salt on the polyelectrolyte charges diminishes their propensity to interact, leading to a decrease in the observed energy change and coacervate quantity. The pH plays an important role in complex formation through its effect on the degree of ionization of the functional groups. Plotting the change in enthalpy with temperature allows the calculation of the heat capacity change (ΔC(p)) for the PO/PGlu interactions. Finally, ITC revealed that complex coacervation is promoted when higher total polymer concentrations or polypeptide chain lengths are used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent progress in the science of complex coacervation
Sing, C. E., & Perry, S. L. (2020) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/d0sm00001a · Cited by 676
50th Anniversary Perspective: A Perspective on Polyelectrolyte Solutions
Muthukumar, M. (2017) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01929 · Cited by 502
Aumiller, W. M., Pir Cakmak, F., Davis, B. W., & Keating, C. D. (2016) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02499 · Cited by 325
Complex coacervate‐based materials for biomedicine
Blocher, W. C., & Perry, S. L. (2017) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1442 · Cited by 312
Cakmak, F. P., Choi, S., Meyer, M. O., Bevilacqua, P. C., & Keating, C. D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19775-w · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Priftis, D., Laugel, N., & Tirrell, M.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-11-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 15947-15957
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W1966987311
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermodynamic Characterization of Polypeptide Complex Coacervation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la302729r
- The paper
- Priftis, D., Laugel, N., & Tirrell, M. (2012). Thermodynamic Characterization of Polypeptide Complex Coacervation. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la302729r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.