The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aggregation Kinetics of Graphene Oxides in Aqueous Solutions: Experiments, Mechanisms, and Modeling
Abstract
Although graphene oxide (GO) has been used in many applications to improve human life quality, its environmental fate and behavior are still largely unknown. In this work, a novel approach that combines experimental measurements and theoretical calculations was used to determine the aggregation kinetics of GO sheets in aqueous solutions under different chemistry conditions (e.g., cation valence and pH). Experimental data showed that both cation valence and pH showed significant effect on the aggregation of GO sheets. The measured critical coagulation concentrations were in good agreement with the predictions of the extended Schulze-Hardy rule. Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) were more effective than Na(+) in aggregating the GO sheets, which could be attributed to the cross-linking between GO sheets by the divalent cations through "bridging" the functional groups at the edges of the GO sheets. When solution pH increases, deprotonation of carboxylic groups was found to play a key role in increasing GO sheet stability and surface charge development. These results suggested that edge-to-edge and face-to-face interactions were the dominant modes of GO aggregation in the presence of divalent metal ions and H(+), respectively. A modified attachment efficiency (α) model was developed on the basis of the Maxwell approach with considerations of both primary and secondary minima. The model predictions matched the experimental measurements of the aggregation kinetics of GO sheets in aqueous solutions under all of the tested experimental conditions well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemistry of graphene oxide
Dreyer, D. R., Park, S., Bielawski, C. W., & Ruoff, R. S. (2010) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b917103g · Cited by 11,653
Cited by
Recent advances in carbon nanomaterial-based adsorbents for water purification
Gusain, R., Kumar, N., & Ray, S. S. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213111 · Cited by 566
Zhao, H., Liu, X., Cao, Z., Zhan, Y., Shi, X., Yang, Y., Zhou, J., & Xu, J. (2016) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.045 · Cited by 429
A critical review on research progress of graphene/cement based composites
Yang, H., Cui, H., Tang, W., Li, Z., Han, N., & Xing, F. (2017) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.019 · Cited by 373
Environmental performance of graphene-based 3D macrostructures
Yousefi, N., Lu, X., Elimelech, M., & Tufenkji, N. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0325-6 · Cited by 371
Chowdhury, I., Mansukhani, N. D., Guiney, L. M., Hersam, M. C., & Bouchard, D. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01866 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, L., Liu, L., Gao, B., Muñoz-Carpena, R., Zhang, M., Chen, H., Zhou, Z., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-12-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 15174-15181
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2320495391
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.