The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Different Shades of Oxide: From Nanoscale Wetting Mechanisms to Contact Printing of Gallium-Based Liquid Metals
Abstract
Gallium-based liquid metals are of interest for a variety of applications including flexible electronics, soft robotics, and biomedical devices. Still, nano- to microscale device fabrication with these materials is challenging because, despite having surface tension 10 times higher than water, they strongly adhere to a majority of substrates. This unusually high adhesion is attributed to the formation of a thin oxide shell; however, its role in the adhesion process has not yet been established. In this work, we demonstrate that, dependent on dynamics of formation and resulting morphology of the liquid metal-substrate interface, GaInSn adhesion can occur in two modes. The first mode occurs when the oxide shell is not ruptured as it makes contact with the substrate. Because of the nanoscale topology of the oxide surface, this mode results in minimal adhesion between the liquid metal and most solids, regardless of substrate's surface energy or texture. In the second mode, the formation of the GaInSn-substrate interface involves rupturing of the original oxide skin and formation of a composite interface that includes contact between the substrate and pieces of old oxide, bare liquid metal, and new oxide. We demonstrate that in this latter mode GaInSn adhesion is dominated by the intimate contact between new oxide and substrate. We also show that by varying the pinned contact line length using varied degrees of surface texturing, the adhesion of GaInSn in this mode can be either decreased or increased. Lastly, we demonstrate how these two adhesion modes limit microcontact printing of GaInSn patterns but can be exploited to repeatedly print individual sub-200 nm liquid metal drops.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tang, J., Zhao, X., Li, J., Guo, R., Zhou, Y., & Liu, J. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b10256 · Cited by 357
Methods to pattern liquid metals
Joshipura, I. D., Ayers, H. R., Majidi, C., & Dickey, M. D. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c5tc00330j · Cited by 326
Wafer-scale two-dimensional semiconductors from printed oxide skin of liquid metals
Carey, B. J., Ou, J. Z., Clark, R. M., Berean, K. J., Zavabeti, A., Chesman, A. S. R., Russo, S. P., Lau, D. W. M., Xu, Z.-Q., Bao, Q., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14482 · Cited by 292
Liu, S., Yuen, M. C., White, E. L., Boley, J. W., Deng, B., Cheng, G. J., & Kramer-Bottiglio, R. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.8b08722 · Cited by 283
Self-citationHong, S. Y., Oh, J. H., Park, H., Yun, J. Y., Jin, S. W., Sun, L., Zi, G., & Ha, J. S. (2017) · NPG Asia Materials · doi:10.1038/am.2017.194 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Doudrick, K., Liu, S., Mutunga, E. M., Klein, K. L., Damle, V., Varanasi, K. K., & Rykaczewski, K.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-06-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 6867-6877
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2314655524
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Different Shades of Oxide: From Nanoscale Wetting Mechanisms to Contact Printing of Gallium-Based Liquid Metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la5012023
- The paper
- Doudrick, K., Liu, S., Mutunga, E. M., Klein, K. L., Damle, V., Varanasi, K. K., & Rykaczewski, K. (2014). Different Shades of Oxide: From Nanoscale Wetting Mechanisms to Contact Printing of Gallium-Based Liquid Metals. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la5012023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.