The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Efficiency Photocatalysis for Pollutant Degradation with MoS2/C3N4Heterostructures
Abstract
Porous graphitic carbon nitride was synthesized by controllable thermal polymerization of urea in air. Their textural, electrical, and optical properties were tuned by varying the heating rate. The presence of proper residual oxygen in carbon nitride matrix had enhanced light absorption and inhibited the recombination of charge carriers. Furthermore, the MoS2 nanosheets were coupled into the carbon nitride to form MoS2/C3N4 heterostructures via a facile ultrasonic chemical method. The optimized MoS2/C3N4 heterostructure with 0.05 wt % MoS2 showed a reaction rate constant as high as 0.301 min(-1), which was 3.6 times that of bare carbon nitride. As analyzed by SEM, TEM, UV-vis absorption, PL and photoelectrochemical measurements, intimate contact interface, extended light response range, enhanced separation speed of charge carriers, and high photocurrent density upon MoS2 coupling led to the photocatalytic promotion of the MoS2/C3N4 heterostructures. In this architecture, MoS2 served as electron trapper to extend the lifetime of separated electron-hole pairs. Meanwhile, the accumulated holes on the surface of carbon nitride oxidized the organic dye directly, which was a predominant process in the photodegradation of organic pollutants in water treatment. The promotional mechanisms and principles reported here would have great significance in heterogeneous photocatalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress, challenge and perspective of heterogeneous photocatalysts
Qu, Y., & Duan, X. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35355e · Cited by 1,466
Zhou, W., Yin, Z., Du, Y., Huang, X., Zeng, Z., Fan, Z., Liu, H., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2013) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201201161 · Cited by 1,258
Ge, L., Han, C., Xiao, X., & Guo, L. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.006 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Ong, W.-J., Tan, L.-L., Ng, Y. H., Yong, S.-T., & Chai, S.-P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00075 · Cited by 7,147
Graphitic C3N4 based noble-metal-free photocatalyst systems: A review
Masih, D., Ma, Y., & Rohani, S. (2017) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.061 · Cited by 674
Ren, Y., Zeng, D., & Ong, W.-J. (2019) · Chinese Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/s1872-2067(19)63293-6 · Cited by 528
Wen, M. Q., Xiong, T., Zang, Z. G., Wei, W., Tang, X. S., & Dong, F. (2016) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.24.010205 · Cited by 448
Kumar, A., Raizada, P., Singh, P., Saini, R. V., Saini, A. K., & Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.123496 · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Q., Zhang, N., Yang, Y., Wang, G., & Ng, D. H. L.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-07-18
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 8965-8972
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2319917126
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.