Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Computer Simulation of the Adsorption of Light Gases in Covalent Organic Frameworks

Garberoglio, G.·2007·Langmuir

Abstract

Grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations of argon, hydrogen, and methane adsorption in four covalent organic frameworks are presented. Argon adsorption isotherms from computer simulations overestimate the amount adsorbed by 25% upon saturation, with respect to the available experiments at T = 87 K. Hydrogen adsorption isotherms show that these materials might attain a 30% increase for the uptake when compared with analogous simulations performed for metal organic frameworks at T = 77 K and T = 298 K. Methane adsorption isotherms give a strong indication that at least one material in this class, COF-102, could meet or exceed the Department of Energy's target of 180 cm3 (STP)/cm3 for P = 35 bar and room temperature. The origin of this large affinity for methane is investigated by analyzing the structure of the potential energy surface of interaction between the adsorbate and the adsorbent.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la701736m

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Garberoglio, G.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2007-10-23
Volume
23
Issue
24
Pages
12154-12158
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2006451145
Cited by
178
References
0
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.