The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nanobubbles at the Interface between Water and a Hydrophobic Solid
Open accessAbstract
A very thin layer (5-80 nm) of gas phase, consisting of discrete bubbles with only about 40 000 molecules, is quite stable at the interface between a hydrophobic solid and water. We prepare this gas phase from either ambient air or from CO(2)(g) through a solvent exchange method reported previously. In this work, we examine the interface using attenuated total internal reflection infrared spectroscopy. The presence of rotational fine structure in the spectrum of CO(2) and D(2)O proves that molecules are present in the gas phase at the interface. The air bubbles are stable for more than 4 days, whereas the CO(2) bubbles are only stable for 1-2 h. We determine the average gas pressure inside the CO(2) bubbles from the IR spectrum in two ways: from the width of the rotational fine structure (P(gas) < 2 atm) and from the intensity in the IR spectrum (P(gas) = 1.1 +/- 0.4 atm). The small difference in gas pressure between the bubbles and the ambient (1 atm) is consistent with the long lifetime. The dimensions and curvature of a set of individual bubbles was determined by atomic force microscopy. The pressures of individual bubbles calculated from the measured curvature using the Laplace equation fall into the range P(gas) = 1.0-1.7 atm, which is concordant with the average pressure measured from the IR spectrum. We believe that the difference in stability of the CO(2) bubbles and the air bubbles is due to a combination of the much lower pressure of CO(2) in the atmosphere and the greater solubility of CO(2) in water, compared to N(2) and O(2). As expected, smaller bubbles have a shorter average lifetime than larger bubbles, and the average pressure and the curvature of individual bubbles decreases with time. Surface plasmon resonance measurements provide supporting evidence that the film is in the gas state: the thin film has a lower refractive index than water, and there are few common contaminants that satisfy this condition. Interfacial gas bubbles are not ubiquitous on hydrophobic solids: bubble-free and bubble-decorated hydrophobic interfaces can be routinely prepared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ultrasound Technologies for Food and Bioprocessing
(2011) · Food Engineering Series · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7472-3 · Cited by 688
Gas Bubbles in Electrochemical Gas Evolution Reactions
Zhao, X., Ren, H., & Luo, L. (2019) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00119 · Cited by 457
Meng, P., Deng, S., Lu, X., Du, Z., Wang, B., Huang, J., Wang, Y., Yu, G., & Xing, B. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es504108u · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, X. H., Quinn, A., & Ducker, W. A.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-03-27
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4756-4764
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2002348892
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanobubbles at the Interface between Water and a Hydrophobic Solid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la703475q
- The paper
- Zhang, X. H., Quinn, A., & Ducker, W. A. (2008). Nanobubbles at the Interface between Water and a Hydrophobic Solid. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la703475q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.