The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mimicking the Stenocara Beetle—Dewetting of Drops from a Patterned Superhydrophobic Surface
Abstract
This paper describes the preparation of superhydrophobic surfaces that have been selectively patterned with circular hydrophilic domains. These materials mimicked the back of the stenocara beetle and collected drops of water if exposed to mist or fog. Under the effect of gravity, the drops dewetted from the hydrophilic regions once a critical volume had been reached. The surface energy in the hydrophilic regions was carefully controlled and assumed various values, allowing us to study the behavior of drops as a function of the superhydrophobic/hydrophilic contrast. We have investigated the development of drops and quantitatively analyzed the critical volumes as a function of several parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioinspired Surfaces with Superwettability: New Insight on Theory, Design, and Applications
Wang, S., Liu, K., Yao, X., & Jiang, L. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400083y · Cited by 1,646
Metadata
- Authors
- Dorrer, C., & Rühe, J.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-05-20
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6154-6158
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2063081522
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mimicking the Stenocara Beetle—Dewetting of Drops from a Patterned Superhydrophobic Surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la800226e
- The paper
- Dorrer, C., & Rühe, J. (2008). Mimicking the Stenocara Beetle—Dewetting of Drops from a Patterned Superhydrophobic Surface. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la800226e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
