The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zeolite-Confined Ruthenium(0) Nanoclusters Catalyst: Record Catalytic Activity, Reusability, and Lifetime in Hydrogen Generation from the Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride
Open accessAbstract
Sodium borohydride, NaBH4, has been considered the most attractive hydrogen-storage material for portable fuel cell applications, as it provides a safe and practical means of producing hydrogen. In a recent communication (Zahmakiran, M.; Ozkar, S. Langmuir 2008, 24, 7065), we have reported a record total turnover number (TTON) of 103 200 mol H2/mol Ru and turnover frequency (TOF) up to 33 000 mol H2/mol Ru x h obtained by using intrazeolite ruthenium(0) nanoclusters in the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride. Here we report full details of the kinetic studies on the intrazeolite ruthenium(0) nanoclusters catalyzed hydrolysis of sodium borohydride in both aqueous and basic solutions. Expectedly, the intrazeolite ruthenium(0) nanoclusters show unprecedented catalytic lifetime, TTON = 27 200 mol H2/mol Ru, and TOF up to 4000 mol H2/mol Ru x h in the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride in basic solution (5% wt NaOH) as well. More importantly, the intrazeolite ruthenium(0) nanoclusters are isolable, bottleable, redispersible, and yet catalytically active. They retain 76% or 61% of their initial catalytic activity at the fifth run with a complete release of hydrogen in aqueous and basic medium, respectively. The intrazeolite ruthenium(0) nanoclusters were isolated as black powder and characterized by using a combination of advanced analytical techniques including XRD, HRTEM, TEM-EDX, SEM, XPS, ICP-OES, and N2 adsorption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Özkar, S., & Finke, R. G. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja012749v · Cited by 293
Sodium borohydride hydrolysis kinetics comparison for nickel, cobalt, and ruthenium boride catalysts
Walter, J. C., Zurawski, A., Montgomery, D., Thornburg, M., & Revankar, S. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.006 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Sodium borohydride as a fuel for the future
Santos, D. M. F., & Sequeira, C. A. C. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.018 · Cited by 401
Muir, S. S., & Yao, X. (2011) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.02.032 · Cited by 364
Brack, P., Dann, S. E., & Wijayantha, K. G. U. (2015) · Energy Science & Engineering · doi:10.1002/ese3.67 · Cited by 310
Ozay, O., Aktas, N., Inger, E., & Sahiner, N. (2011) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.045 · Cited by 106
Niu, W., Ren, D., Han, Y., Wu, Y., & Gou, X. (2012) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.099 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Zahmakiran, M., & Özkar, S.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-02-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2667-2678
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2070538965
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zeolite-Confined Ruthenium(0) Nanoclusters Catalyst: Record Catalytic Activity, Reusability, and Lifetime in Hydrogen Generation from the Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la803391c
- The paper
- Zahmakiran, M., & Özkar, S. (2009). Zeolite-Confined Ruthenium(0) Nanoclusters Catalyst: Record Catalytic Activity, Reusability, and Lifetime in Hydrogen Generation from the Hydrolysis of Sodium Borohydride. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la803391c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.