The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Underwater Sustainability of the “Cassie” State of Wetting
Abstract
A rough hydrophobic surface when immersed in water can result in a "Cassie" state of wetting in which the water is in contact with both the solid surface and the entrapped air. The sustainability of the entrapped air on such surfaces is important for underwater applications such as reduction of flow resistance in microchannels and drag reduction of submerged bodies such as hydrofoils. We utilize an optical technique based on total internal reflection of light at the water-air interface to quantify the spatial distribution of trapped air on such a surface and its variation with immersion time. With this technique, we evaluate the sustainability of the Cassie state on hydrophobic surfaces with four different kinds of textures. The textures studied are regular arrays of pillars, ridges, and holes that were created in silicon by a wet etching technique, and also a texture of random craters that was obtained through electrodischarge machining of aluminum. These surfaces were rendered hydrophobic with a self-assembled layer of fluorooctyl trichlorosilane. Depending on the texture, the size and shape of the trapped air pockets were found to vary. However, irrespective of the texture, both the size and the number of air pockets were found to decrease with time gradually and eventually disappear, suggesting that the sustainability of the "Cassie" state is finite for all the microstructures studied. This is possibly due to diffusion of air from the trapped air pockets into the water. The time scale for disappearance of air pockets was found to depend on the kind of microstructure and the hydrostatic pressure at the water-air interface. For the surface with a regular array of pillars, the air pockets were found to be in the form of a thin layer perched on top of the pillars with a large lateral extent compared to the spacing between pillars. For other surfaces studied, the air pockets are smaller and are of the same order as the characteristic length scale of the texture. Measurements for the surface with holes indicate that the time for air-pocket disappearance reduces as the hydrostatic pressure is increased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wettability of porous surfaces
Cassie, A. B. D., & Baxter, S. (1944) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9444000546 · Cited by 13,807
Cited by
Bioinspired Superwettability Electrospun Micro/Nanofibers and Their Applications
Hou, L., Wang, N., Wu, J., Cui, Z., Jiang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201801114 · Cited by 284
The springtail cuticle as a blueprint for omniphobic surfaces
Hensel, R., Neinhuis, C., & Werner, C. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00438a · Cited by 259
Droplet and bubble wetting behaviors: The roles of surface wettability and roughness
Xiao, Y., Zheng, J., He, Y., & Wang, L. (2022) · Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.130008 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Bobji, M. S., Kumar, S. V., Asthana, A., & Govardhan, R. N.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-09-25
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 12120-12126
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2034381084
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.