The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon Support Effects on Bimetallic Pt−Ru Nanoparticles Formed from Molecular Precursors
Abstract
We describe the preparation, structural characterization, and support interactions experienced by two different compositions of Pt−Ru nanoparticles supported on several carbons (carbon black, fullerene soot, and desulfurized carbon black). The bimetallic nanoparticles, obtained by reduction of the neutral molecular precursors PtRu 5 C(CO) 16 and Pt 2 Ru 4 (CO) 18 (the latter of which lacks a central “stabilizing” carbide core) at elevated temperatures in a hydrogen atmosphere, show a structural homology, exhibiting exceptionally narrow size and compositional distributions. A detailed structural picture of the nanoparticles has been deduced on the basis of in-situ extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), and X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES). These techniques reveal that the bimetallic nanoparticles have Pt/Ru compositions of 1:5 and 2:4, respectively, and average diameters lying between 1.0 and 1.5 nm. The local metal coordination environments reveal a nonstatistical distribution of the two metals in the nanoparticles. Specifically, Pt shows a marked preference for segregation to the particle surfaces under an H 2 atmosphere. The data also reveal a difference in the structural environment of the nanoparticles when formed on the fullerene soot support. Interactions between Ru and low- Z atoms are revealed through XANES, which, taken collectively with the other data presented, leads us to propose a possible Ru−C compound formation on this latter support phase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In Situ X‐Ray Absorption Studies of a Pt‐Ru Electrocatalyst
McBreen, J., & Mukerjee, S. (1995) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2049993 · Cited by 242
Cited by
Yang, H., Vogel, W., Lamy, C., & Alonso-Vante, N. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp049034+ · Cited by 323
Deivaraj, T. C., & Lee, J. Y. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.010 · Cited by 174
Park, K. C., Jang, I. Y., Wongwiriyapan, W., Morimoto, S., Kim, Y. J., Jung, Y. C., Toya, T., & Endo, M. (2010) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b923153f · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Hills, C. W., Nashner, M. S., Frenkel, A. I., Shapley, J. R., & Nuzzo, R. G.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-01-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 690-700
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2018618424
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
