Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Shear-Induced Orientation Phenomena in Suspensions of Cellulose Microcrystals, Revealed by Small Angle X-ray Scattering

Ebeling, T., Paillet, M., Borsali, R., Diat, O., Dufresne, A., Cavaillé, J-Y., Chanzy, H.·1999·Langmuir

Abstract

The alignment of cellulose microcrystals in a 6.9% (w/w) colloidal aqueous suspension under shear was characterized using small angle synchrotron radiation scattering. Prior to shearing, the microcrystals appeared randomly oriented and went through a two-step alignment process with increasing shear rate. At shear rates lower than 5 s - 1, the X-ray scattering patterns indicated little or no preferential alignment in the shear direction; however, in the plane perpendicular to the shear direction, the microcrystals were preferentially oriented in the vertical direction. At shear rates of 5 s - 1 and higher, the microcrystals were aligned horizontally along the shear direction. These orientation phenomena were found to be dependent on shear rate and completely reversible. They are likely due to the presence of planar domains of randomly oriented microcrystals which align at low shear rates and are broken up at higher shear rates enabling alignment of the individual microcyrstals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la990046+

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Ebeling, T., Paillet, M., Borsali, R., Diat, O., Dufresne, A., Cavaillé, J.-Y., & Chanzy, H.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1999-08-12
Volume
15
Issue
19
Pages
6123-6126
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2006094731
Cited by
164
References
2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.