Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating Pore Sizes in Mesoporous Materials: A Simplified Standard Adsorption Method and a Simplified Broekhoff−de Boer Method

Lukens,, Wayne W., Schmidt-Winkel, Patrick, Zhao, Dongyuan, Feng, Jianglin, Stucky, Galen D.·1999·Langmuir

Abstract

The diameters of primary mesopores in materials with well-defined cylindrical pores can be accurately determined by the 4 V / A method when the volume and surface area are determined by a standard adsorption method and 13.5 Å 2 is used as the molecular area of adsorbed nitrogen. A simple method for determining standard adsorption using the statistical thickness of the adsorbed gas layer defined by Frenkel−Halsey−Hill (FHH) theory is described. For materials in which the pores are not cylindrical or well-defined, a simplified Broekhoff−de Boer method can be used to determine pore dimensions. The use of Hill's approximation for the thickness of the adsorbed gas layer in the Broekhoff−de Boer method simplifies its use. The results of these methods on small pore MCM-41 materials, large pore SBA-15 materials, and spherical pore mesocellular foams are reported.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la990209u

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Lukens, Schmidt-Winkel, P., Zhao, D., Feng, J., & Stucky, G. D.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
1999-06-25
Volume
15
Issue
16
Pages
5403-5409
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2082499728
Cited by
471
References
1
FWCI
18.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.