The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shear Dynamics of Aqueous Suspensions of Cellulose Whiskers
Abstract
The rheology of rigid rod cellulose whisker suspensions has been investigated. The isotropic-at-rest suspension flow curves show two plateaus, one at low shear rates and another at high shear rates, that reflect the flow of isotropic (at low shear rates) or oriented (at high shear rates) suspensions. From the low shear rate viscosity plateau vs concentration, we see that the system is in the semidilute region above 0.02 wt %, in agreement with the theoretical predictions. From the same curve, we can estimate a maximum packing concentration of whiskers rods that corresponds to the experimentally measured isotropic-to-anisotropic transition. The high shear rate plateau viscosity data show that the suspension is still in the dilute state above 0.6 wt %. The critical concentration at the dilute−semidilute transition is thus strongly dependent on the state of order, which suggests that care has to be taken when measuring parameters extracted from flowing solutions or suspensions, as for example occurring with Ubbelhode viscometry. Above a certain critical concentration, the suspensions become anisotropic at rest. The viscosity vs concentration curve has a maximum that vanishes at high shear rates as for liquid crystalline polymer solutions. Rheological and rheo-optical observations show fast inception and relaxation of both the rheological functions and the texture, in complete contrast with liquid crystalline polymer solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers
Favier, V., Chanzy, H., & Cavaille, J. Y. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00122a053 · Cited by 1,149
Cited by
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose
Saito, T., Kimura, S., Nishiyama, Y., & Isogai, A. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0703970 · Cited by 2,493
Azizi Samir, M. A. S., Alloin, F., & Dufresne, A. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0493685 · Cited by 2,311
Pääkkö, M., Ankerfors, M., Kosonen, H., Nykänen, A., Ahola, S., Österberg, M., Ruokolainen, J., Laine, J., Larsson, P. T., Ikkala, O., et al. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm061215p · Cited by 1,962
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Metadata
- Authors
- Bercea, M., & Navard, P.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-07-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 6011-6016
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2033231591
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.