The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amphiphilic Polymer Brushes Grown from the Silicon Surface by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization
Abstract
Homopolymer and block amphiphilic polymer brushes on silicon wafers have been successfully prepared by combining the self-assembled monolayer of initiator and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Two methods for self-assembly of initiator monolayer were compared: One was to treat the silicon surface with 6-((2-bromo-2-methyl)propionyloxy)hexyltrichlorosilane solution (solution method), and the other was to treat it with the vapor of 3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane, followed by amidization with 2-bromoisobutyric acid (vapor method). While the solution method produced particles due to cross-linked products of the chlorosilane on silicon surface, the vapor method gave a uniform surface. The homopolymer brushes of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(acrylamide) (PAAM) were prepared by ATRP on the modified silicon wafer by the initiator. The amphiphilic block copolymer brushes consisting of PAAM and PMMA blocks were obtained by using the homopolymer brush as the macroinitiator for the second ATRP polymerization of another monomer. XPS revealed that the first polymer layer of the surface was partly covered with the second polymer layer after block copolymerized with the second monomer. AFM measurement of the amphiphilic block polymer brush imaged different morphology when they were treated with water and toluene. The amphiphilic polymer brush was stretched out from the surface and the individual polymer chains have sufficient free volume to permit the conformational change in different solvents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds
Silverstein, R. M., & Bassler, G. C. (1962) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed039p546 · Cited by 14,272
Cited by
Barbey, R., Lavanant, L., Paripovic, D., Schüwer, N., Sugnaux, C., Tugulu, S., & Klok, H.-A. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900045a · Cited by 1,753
Ouchi, M., Terashima, T., & Sawamoto, M. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900234b · Cited by 1,257
Zoppe, J. O., Ataman, N. C., Mocny, P., Wang, J., Moraes, J., & Klok, H.-A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00314 · Cited by 1,046
Dual‐Responsive Surfaces That Switch between Superhydrophilicity and Superhydrophobicity
Xia, F., Feng, L., Wang, S., Sun, T., Song, W., Jiang, W., & Jiang, L. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501772 · Cited by 344
Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization from Cellulose Fibers at Ambient Temperature
Carlmark, A., & Malmström, E. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja016582h · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Kong, X., Kawai, T., Abe, J., & Iyoda, T.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-02-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1837-1844
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2011896820
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.