The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase Behavior and Block Sequence Effects in Lithium Perchlorate-Doped Poly(isoprene-b-styrene-b-ethylene oxide) and Poly(styrene-b-isoprene-b-ethylene oxide) Triblock Copolymers
Abstract
We compare the phase behavior of a series of lithium perchlorate-doped poly(isoprene- b -styrene- b -ethylene oxide) (ISO) and poly(styrene- b -isoprene- b -ethylene oxide) (SIO) triblock copolymers. Complete phase diagram isopleths ( f I = f S ) are described for the lithium-doped ISO system and the previously reported lithium-doped SIO system. We examine the effects of block sequencing on the microstructures present in the doped SIO and ISO diagrams using small-angle X-ray scattering. Three phases were identified in the doped ISO phase diagram isopleth: two-domain lamellae (LAM 2 ), core−shell cylinders (CSC), and three-domain lamellae (LAM 3 ). The order−disorder transition temperatures increase dramatically upon doping and salt loadings up to [O]:[Li] concentrations of 3:1 are accomplished without macrophase separation. The increase in segregation strength in the ISO system upon doping leads to a disappearance of the more geometrically elaborate network phase in favor of the CSC phase as a result of the imbalance in interaction parameters. In addition, we used differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to determine the effect of having either a glassy block or a rubbery block adjacent to the poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) block in both neat and doped samples. Melting temperatures for a given domain thickness are lower in the ISO triblock copolymers relative to the SIO counterparts. This temperature discrepancy is associated with confinement by the glassy polystyrene block, which reduces the crystallite size, leading to PEO melting temperatures that are closer to room temperature in ISO triblock copolymers. Through comparative phase diagram and DSC studies, we have gleaned the effects of connectivity and lithium perchlorate concentration on triblock copolymer microstructure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fetters, L. J., Lohse, D. J., Richter, D., Witten, T. A., & Zirkel, A. (1994) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00095a001 · Cited by 1,999
Morphology of semicrystalline block copolymers of ethylene-(ethylene-alt-propylene)
Rangarajan, P., Register, R. A., & Fetters, L. J. (1993) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00069a034 · Cited by 191
Cited by
50th Anniversary Perspective: Block Polymers—Pure Potential
Bates, C. M., & Bates, F. S. (2017) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02355 · Cited by 788
Self-citationBlock copolymer electrolytes for rechargeable lithium batteries
Young, W., Kuan, W., & Epps (2014) · Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics · doi:10.1002/polb.23404 · Cited by 417
Phase Behaviour and Morphologies of Block Copolymers
Abetz, V., & Simon, P. F. W. (2005) · Advances in Polymer Science · doi:10.1007/12_004 · Cited by 361
Nucleation and Crystallization in Diblock and Triblock Copolymers
Müller, A. J., Balsamo, V., & Arnal, M. L. (2005) · Advances in Polymer Science · doi:10.1007/12_001 · Cited by 294
Castillo, R. V., & Müller, A. J. (2009) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.03.002 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Epps, T. H., Bailey, T. S., Waletzko, R., & Bates, F. S.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-03-19
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2873-2881
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W1964493175
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.