Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reorganization of Binary Polymer Brushes: Reversible Switching of Surface Microstructures and Nanomechanical Properties

Lemieux, M., Usov, D., Minko, S., Stamm, M., Shulha, H., Tsukruk, V. V.·2003·Macromolecules

Abstract

For a binary polymer brush layer, we investigated the morphological state, the structure reordering, and the nanomechanical properties as a function of treatment with selective solvents. Two incompatible polymers, poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) and poly(styrene- co -2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorostyrene) (PSF), were randomly grafted one after another onto a silicon wafer via the “grafting from” method producing thick (20−150 nm) dense mixed brush layers. The resulting layers possessed a nanostructured surface exhibiting either complete vertical or a combination of vertical and lateral microphase segregation of the two components. The lateral and vertical reorganization of the mixed brush layer was observed to be quick (on the order of a few minutes) and reversible for at least 100 “switches” between good and bad solvent states for each component. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images revealed different surface structure states upon exposure to different solvents. Since PSF and PMA are mechanically dissimilar (glassy and rubbery, respectively) at room temperature, phase imaging was used to roughly verify the resulting structure. However, to determine vertical segregation in addition to truly authenticating the lateral ordering, surface nanomechanical mapping was conducted, which also allowed, for the first time, to directly determine the elastic modulus and adhesion. Results show the bimodal response of the mechanically heterogeneous surface, with elastic modulus and adhesion distributions very different for the “glassy state” and the “rubbery state”. Furthermore, depth profiling of the elastic modulus conducted for binary brushes confirmed the vertical segregation in the mixed brush. Results demonstrated the dramatic mechanical contrast of the surface as a function of solvent conditions and decisively revealed the modes of phase segregation in a binary polymer brush.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma034634c

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lemieux, M., Usov, D., Minko, S., Stamm, M., Shulha, H., & Tsukruk, V. V.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2003-08-20
Volume
36
Issue
19
Pages
7244-7255
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2135879114
Cited by
172
References
4
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.