The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polyelectrolyte Complexes of Chitosan and Poly(acrylic acid) As Proton Exchange Membranes for Fuel Cells
Abstract
Ionically cross-linked polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) membranes of cationic chitosan (CS) and anionic poly(acrylic acid) (PAAc) were synthesized and assessed for applicability in fuel cells. CS and PAAc were blended in different weight ratios and the resulting membranes were posttreated to enable the formation of the polyelectrolyte complex. The ionic cross-linking occurring on blending the polyelectrolytes excludes the need of using other cross-linking agents. These membranes were extensively characterized for morphology, their intermolecular interactions, thermal stability, and physicomechanical properties using SEM, FTIR, DSC, sorption studies, and tensile testing, respectively. Methanol permeability and proton conductivity were estimated and compared with respective values for Nafion 117. PEC membranes exhibited high ion exchange capacity (IEC), high proton conductivity, low methanol permeability, and adequate thermal and mechanical stability. Among the blends synthesized, the membrane blend with 50 wt % of CS and 50 wt % of PAAc, was identified as ideal for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) applications as it exhibited low methanol permeability (3.9 × 10 -8 cm 2 /s), excellent physicomechanical properties and comparatively high proton conductivity (0.038 S·cm -1 ). Above all, the cost-effectiveness and simple fabrication technique involved in the synthesis of such PECs makes their applicability in DMFC quite attractive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kerres, J., Ullrich, A., Meier, F., & Häring, T. (1999) · Solid State Ionics · doi:10.1016/s0167-2738(99)00181-2 · Cited by 454
Pervaporation membranes in direct methanol fuel cells
Pivovar, B. S., Wang, Y., & Cussler, E. L. (1999) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(98)00264-6 · Cited by 403
Cited by
Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications
Peighambardoust, S. J., Rowshanzamir, S., & Amjadi, M. (2010) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.017 · Cited by 2,186
Cellulose-based hydrogel materials: chemistry, properties and their prospective applications
Kabir, S. M. F., Sikdar, P. P., Haque, B., Bhuiyan, M. A. R., Ali, A., & Islam, M. N. (2018) · Progress in Biomaterials · doi:10.1007/s40204-018-0095-0 · Cited by 565
An overview of proton exchange membranes for fuel cells: Materials and manufacturing
Ahmad, S., Nawaz, T., Ali, A., Orhan, M. F., Samreen, A., & Kannan, A. M. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.099 · Cited by 336
Chitosan–sodium alginate polyion complexes as fuel cell membranes
Smitha, B., Sridhar, S., & Khan, A. A. (2005) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.02.018 · Cited by 332
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Smitha, B., Sridhar, S., & Khan, A. A.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-02-24
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2233-2239
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2000141051
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.