The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase Separation in Polyfluorene-Based Conjugated Polymer Blends: Lateral and Vertical Analysis of Blend Spin-Cast Thin Films
Abstract
We have studied phase separation in polyfluorene-based electroluminescent polymer blends consisting of poly(2,7-(9,9-di- n -octylfluorene- alt -benzothiadiazole) (F8BT) and poly(2,7-(9,9-di- n -octylfluorene)- alt -(1,4-phenylene-((4- sec -butylphenyl)imino)-1,4-phenylene)) (TFB). We present detailed studies on spin-cast thin-film morphology of the blends, using micro-Raman spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Micron-scale lateral phase separation is observed in these blend thin films. However, these phase-separated domains are not pure at the submicron length scale, and a nanoscale vertical phase segregation occurs with enrichment of the lower surface energy component (TFB) at both air and substrate interfaces. Imaging of the spatial uniformity of electroluminescence emission on the microscopic scale indicates spatially localised charge-carrier recombination in light-emitting diodes (LEDs) fabricated with these blends. On the basis of these studies, we propose a model for the development of thin-film phase-separated structure in spin-cast F8BT:TFB blends. LEDs without an additional hole-injection/transporting layer such as a poly(styrenesulfonate)-doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDT:PSS) have also been characterized to examine the self-organized vertical phase structure found in these blends. The results show that initial performance equivalent to devices with a PEDT:PSS layer is achievable in LEDs which contain only a single layer of F8BT:TFB blend material, confirming that the TFB wetting layer acts efficiently as a hole-accepting/transporting layer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polymer-polymer phase behavior
Bates, F. S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.251.4996.898 · Cited by 1,463
Cited by
Interface investigation and engineering – achieving high performance polymer photovoltaic devices
Chen, L.-M., Xu, Z., Hong, Z., & Yang, Y. (2010) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b925382c · Cited by 565
Bulk‐Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells: Five Core Technologies for Their Commercialization
Kang, H., Kim, G., Kim, J., Kwon, S., Kim, H., & Lee, K. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201601197 · Cited by 489
Self-citationLiquid Crystalline Ordering and Charge Transport in Semiconducting Materials
Pisula, W., Zorn, M., Chang, J. Y., Müllen, K., & Zentel, R. (2009) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200900251 · Cited by 400
Neto, B. A. D., Lapis, A. A. M., da Silva Júnior, E. N., & Dupont, J. (2013) · European Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201201161 · Cited by 328
Conjugated‐Polymer Blends for Optoelectronics
McNeill, C. R., & Greenham, N. C. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200900783 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J.-S., Ho, P. K. H., Murphy, C. E., & Friend, R. H.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-03-23
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2861-2871
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W1996575788
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.