Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Selective Detection of TNT and Picric Acid by Conjugated Polymer Film Sensors with Donor–Acceptor Architecture

Xu, Bowei, Wu, Xiaofu, Li, Haibo, Tong, Hui, Wang, Lixiang·2011·Macromolecules

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommunication to the...Communication to the EditorNEXTSelective Detection of TNT and Picric Acid by Conjugated Polymer Film Sensors with Donor–Acceptor ArchitectureBowei Xu†‡, Xiaofu Wu†‡, Haibo Li†‡, Hui Tong*†, and Lixiang Wang*†View Author Information† State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, P. R. China‡ Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, P. R. ChinaE-mail: [email protected] (H.T.), [email protected] (L.W.).Cite this: Macromolecules 2011, 44, 13, 5089–5092Publication Date (Web):June 9, 2011Publication History Received3 May 2011Revised1 June 2011Published online9 June 2011Published inissue 12 July 2011https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ma201003fhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ma201003frapid-communicationACS PublicationsCopyright © 2011 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views4873Altmetric-Citations243LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (1)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Fluorescence,Polymer films,Polymers,Quenching,Solution chemistry Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma201003f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Xu, B., Wu, X., Li, H., Tong, H., & Wang, L.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2011-06-09
Volume
44
Issue
13
Pages
5089-5092
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2326839932
Cited by
270
References
0
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.