The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymer Nanoparticles via Living Radical Polymerization in Aqueous Dispersions: Design and Applications
Abstract
In the past decade, living radical polymerization (LRP) has revolutionized academic research in the fields of free-radical polymerization and materials design. Sophisticated macromolecular architectures, designed for a variety of applications and end-use properties, can now be synthesized using relatively simple LRP chemistries that do not require stringent oxygen or moisture free environments, subzero reaction temperatures, or highly purified reagents. Publications abound not only in the fundamentals of LRP but also its use in designing tailor-made polymers and polymer–hybrid composites. Corporate research organizations have also been actively involved in LRP, with numerous patents being issued annually. Despite the intense research interest, however, comparatively few products have been commercialized, with high process costs being a primary factor. Most commercial free-radical polymerizations are conducted in aqueous dispersions due to significantly lower process costs compared to bulk or solution polymerizations. Successful widespread commercialization of LRP will be advantaged by the development of waterborne processes yielding aqueous dispersions of nanoparticles. Conducting LRP within nanoparticles (i.e., using nanoscale particles as self-contained chemical reactors or “nanoreactors”) enables faster reaction times and if harnessed properly will provide better control over the polymer livingness; it also has the potential in the control of the particle mesostructure and microstructure. Recent progress in LRP dispersions is presented with a discussion of outstanding issues and challenges as well as the outlook for adoption of LRP dispersions by industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, J.-S., & Matyjaszewski, K. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00125a035 · Cited by 4,622
Controlled/living radical polymerization: Features, developments, and perspectives
Braunecker, W. A., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.11.002 · Cited by 3,202
Controlled/living radical polymerization in aqueous media: homogeneous and heterogeneous systems
Qiu, J., Charleux, B., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2001) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00033-8 · Cited by 595
Cited by
Controlled/Living Radical Polymerization in Dispersed Systems: An Update
Zetterlund, P. B., Thickett, S. C., Perrier, S., Bourgeat-Lami, E., & Lansalot, M. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500625k · Cited by 485
Thermo-responsive Diblock Copolymer Worm Gels in Non-polar Solvents
Fielding, L. A., Lane, J. A., Derry, M. J., Mykhaylyk, O. O., & Armes, S. P. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja501756h · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Monteiro, M. J., & Cunningham, M. F.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-04-25
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4939-4957
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2029838204
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.