The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grafting Bimodal Polymer Brushes on Nanoparticles Using Controlled Radical Polymerization
Abstract
RAFT (reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer) polymerization has been widely used to synthesize different polymer architectures such as polymer brushes on nanoparticles for incorporation into polymer nanocomposites. It is believed that these polymer brushes, with the same chemistry as the matrix polymer, can be employed to improve filler dispersion by compatibilizing unfavorable enthalpic interactions between the inorganic nanoparticles and their organic host matrices. However, monomodal brush graft nanoparticles are found to aggregate into a range of isotropic and anisotropic morphologies, formed due to a delicate balance between enthalpic and entropic interfacial interactions. This coupling of enthalpy and entropy leaves only a small window of graft densities and molecular weights to obtain randomly dispersed filler morphologies. These issues can be countered by using a bimodal polymer brush that contains a small number of long homopolymer chains that can entangle, and a high density of short brushes that screens the particle/particle attraction, thereby aiding in decoupling the interfacial enthalpic and entropic interactions. In the present work, we demonstrate a robust step-by-step technique using RAFT polymerization to synthesize these bidisperse/bimodal polymer brush-anchored nanoparticles. A layer of dense brush of the first population was initially prepared using surface-initiated RAFT polymerization from colloidal silica nanoparticles. After cleavage of the chain transfer agent from the first population of chain ends, a second RAFT agent was attached onto the silica nanoparticles and then a monomer, which may be the same or different from the first brush, was polymerized. This versatile and widely applicable route enables us to independently control the molecular variables of the attached chains, such as composition, molecular weights and graft densities of the individual populations. The bimodal brush-grafted colloidal silica nanoparticles show superior dispersion and interaction with a homopolymer matrix when compared to monomodal brush-grafted particles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Williams, M. L., Landel, R. F., & Ferry, J. D. (1955) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01619a008 · Cited by 8,083
Cited by
Nanocomposites with Polymer Grafted Nanoparticles
Kumar, S. K., Jouault, N., Benicewicz, B., & Neely, T. (2013) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma4001385 · Cited by 772
Self-citationHui, C. M., Pietrasik, J., Schmitt, M., Mahoney, C., Choi, J., Bockstaller, M. R., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm4023634 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Rungta, A., Natarajan, B., Neely, T., Dukes, D., Schadler, L. S., & Benicewicz, B. C.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-11-28
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 9303-9311
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2145718440
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.