Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grafting Bimodal Polymer Brushes on Nanoparticles Using Controlled Radical Polymerization

Rungta, Atri, Natarajan, Bharath, Neely, Tony, Dukes, Douglas, Schadler, Linda S., Benicewicz, Brian C.·2012·Macromolecules

Abstract

RAFT (reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer) polymerization has been widely used to synthesize different polymer architectures such as polymer brushes on nanoparticles for incorporation into polymer nanocomposites. It is believed that these polymer brushes, with the same chemistry as the matrix polymer, can be employed to improve filler dispersion by compatibilizing unfavorable enthalpic interactions between the inorganic nanoparticles and their organic host matrices. However, monomodal brush graft nanoparticles are found to aggregate into a range of isotropic and anisotropic morphologies, formed due to a delicate balance between enthalpic and entropic interfacial interactions. This coupling of enthalpy and entropy leaves only a small window of graft densities and molecular weights to obtain randomly dispersed filler morphologies. These issues can be countered by using a bimodal polymer brush that contains a small number of long homopolymer chains that can entangle, and a high density of short brushes that screens the particle/particle attraction, thereby aiding in decoupling the interfacial enthalpic and entropic interactions. In the present work, we demonstrate a robust step-by-step technique using RAFT polymerization to synthesize these bidisperse/bimodal polymer brush-anchored nanoparticles. A layer of dense brush of the first population was initially prepared using surface-initiated RAFT polymerization from colloidal silica nanoparticles. After cleavage of the chain transfer agent from the first population of chain ends, a second RAFT agent was attached onto the silica nanoparticles and then a monomer, which may be the same or different from the first brush, was polymerized. This versatile and widely applicable route enables us to independently control the molecular variables of the attached chains, such as composition, molecular weights and graft densities of the individual populations. The bimodal brush-grafted colloidal silica nanoparticles show superior dispersion and interaction with a homopolymer matrix when compared to monomodal brush-grafted particles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma3018876

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Rungta, A., Natarajan, B., Neely, T., Dukes, D., Schadler, L. S., & Benicewicz, B. C.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2012-11-28
Volume
45
Issue
23
Pages
9303-9311
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2145718440
Cited by
171
References
1
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.