The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthesis of 5 H-Dithieno[3,2-b:2′,3′-d]pyran as an Electron-Rich Building Block for Donor–Acceptor Type Low-Bandgap Polymers
Abstract
We describe the detailed synthesis and characterization of an electron-rich building block, dithienopyran (DTP), and its application as a donor unit in low-bandgap conjugated polymers. The electron-donating property of the DTP unit was found to be the strongest among the most frequently used donor units such as benzodithiophene (BDT) or cyclopentadithiophene (CPDT) units. When the DTP unit was polymerized with the strongly electron-deficient difluorobenzothiadiazole (DFBT) unit, a regiorandom polymer (PDTP–DFBT, bandgap = 1.38 eV) was obtained. For comparison with the DTP unit, polymers containing alternating benzodithiophene (BDT) or cyclopentadithiophene (CPDT) units and the DFBT unit were synthesized (PBDT–DFBT and PCPDT–DFBT). We found that the DTP based polymer PDTP–DFBT shows significantly improved solubility and processability compared to the BDT or CPDT based polymers. Consequently, very high molecular weight and soluble PDTP–DFBT can be obtained with less bulky side chains. Interestingly, PDTP–DFBT shows excellent performance in bulk-heterojunction solar cells with power conversion efficiencies reaching 8.0%, which is significantly higher than PBDT–DFBT and PCPDT–DFBT based devices. This study demonstrates that DTP is a promising building block for high-performance solar cell materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coffin, R. C., Peet, J., Rogers, J., & Bazan, G. C. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.403 · Cited by 597
Cited by
25th Anniversary Article: A Decade of Organic/Polymeric Photovoltaic Research
Dou, L., You, J., Hong, Z., Xu, Z., Li, G., Street, R. A., & Yang, Y. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302563 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citationStability of organic solar cells: challenges and strategies
Cheng, P., & Zhan, X. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00593k · Cited by 1,046
Yan, J., & Saunders, B. R. (2014) · RSC Adv. · doi:10.1039/c4ra07064j · Cited by 320
Transparent Polymer Photovoltaics for Solar Energy Harvesting and Beyond
Chang, S.-Y., Cheng, P., Li, G., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.005 · Cited by 309
Self-citationNarrowing the Band Gap: The Key to High-Performance Organic Photovoltaics
Cheng, P., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00157 · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dou, L., Chen, C.-C., Yoshimura, K., Ohya, K., Chang, W.-H., Gao, J., Liu, Y., Richard, E., & Yang, Y.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-04-26
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3384-3390
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W4242013550
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.