Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Well-Dispersed Fractal Aggregates as Filler in Polymer−Silica Nanocomposites: Long-Range Effects in Rheology

Open access
Jouault, Nicolas, Vallat, Perrine, Dalmas, Florent, Said, Sylvère, Jestin, Jacques, Boué, François·2009·Macromolecules

Abstract

We are presenting a new method of processing polystyrene−silica nanocomposites, which results in a very well-defined dispersion of small primary aggregates (assembly of 15 nanoparticles of 10 nm diameter) in the matrix. The process is based on the use of a high boiling point solvent, in which the nanoparticles are well dispersed, and a controlled evaporation procedure. The filler’s fine network structure is determined over a wide range of sizes, using a combination of small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) and transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) experiments. The mechanical response of the nanocomposite material has been investigated for both small (ARES oscillatory shear and dynamical mechanical analysis) and large deformations (uniaxial traction) as a function of the concentration of the particles in the matrix. Our findings show that with a simple tuning parameter, the silica filler volume fraction, we can investigate in the same way the structure−property correlations related to the two main reinforcement effects: the filler network contribution and a filler−polymer matrix effect. Above a silica volume fraction threshold, we were able to highlight a divergence of the reinforcement factor, which is clearly correlated to the formation of a connected network built up from the finite-size primary aggregates and is thus a direct illustration of the filler network contribution. For a silica volume fraction lower than this percolation threshold, we obtain a new additional elastic contribution of the material, of longer terminal time than the matrix. This cannot be attributed to the filler network effect, as the filler is well dispersed, each element separated from the next by a mean distance of 60 nm. This new result, which implies the filler−matrix contribution of the reinforcement, must include interfacial contributions. Nevertheless, it cannot be described solely with the concept of glassy layer, i.e., only as a dynamic effect, because its typical length scale extension should be much shorter, of the order of 2 nm. This implies a need to reconsider the polymer−filler interaction potential and to take into account a possible additional polymer conformational contribution due to the existence of indirect long-range bridging of the filler by the chains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma801908u

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Jouault, N., Vallat, P., Dalmas, F., Said, S., Jestin, J., & Boué, F.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2009-02-18
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
2031-2040
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2044250060
Cited by
278
References
1
FWCI
13.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Well-Dispersed Fractal Aggregates as Filler in Polymer−Silica Nanocomposites: Long-Range Effects in Rheology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ma801908u
The paper
Jouault, N., Vallat, P., Dalmas, F., Said, S., Jestin, J., & Boué, F. (2009). Well-Dispersed Fractal Aggregates as Filler in Polymer−Silica Nanocomposites: Long-Range Effects in Rheology. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma801908u

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.