The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Donor−Acceptor Polymers Incorporating Alkylated Dithienylbenzothiadiazole for Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells: Pronounced Effect of Positioning Alkyl Chains
Abstract
4,7-Di(thiophen-2-yl)benzothiadiazole ( DTBT ) has been used to construct a number of donor−acceptor low band gap polymers for bulk heterojunction (BHJ) photovoltaics with high efficiency numbers. Its strong tendency to π-stack often leads to polymers with low molecular weight and poor solubility, which could potentially be alleviated by anchoring solubilizing chains onto the DTBT unit. A systematic study of the effect of positioning alkyl chains on DTBT on properties of polymers was implemented by investigating a small library of structurally related polymers with identical conjugated backbone. This series of donor−acceptor polymers employed a common donor unit, benzo[2,1- b:3,4- b′ ]dithiophene ( BDT ), and modified DTBT as the acceptor unit. Three variations of modified DTBT units were prepared with alkyl side chains at (a) the 5- and 6-positions of 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole ( DTsolBT ), (b) 3-positions of the flanking thienyl groups ( 3DTBT ), and (c) 4-positions ( 4DTBT ), in addition to the unmodified DTBT . Contrary to results from previous studies, optical and electrochemical studies disclosed almost identical band gap and energy levels between PBDT−4DTBT and PBDT−DTBT . These results indicated that anchoring solubilizing alkyl chains on the 4-positions of DTBT only introduced a minimum steric hindrance within BDT−DTBT, maintaining the extended conjugation of the fundamental structural unit ( BDT−DTBT ). More importantly, the additional high molecular weight and excellent solubility of PBDT−4DTBT led to a more uniform mixture with PCBM, with better control on the film morphology. All these features of PBDT−4DTBT led to a significantly improved efficiency of related BHJ solar cells (up to 2.2% has been observed), triple the efficiency obtained from BHJ devices fabricated from the “conventional” PBDT−DTBT (0.72%). Our discovery reinforced the importance of high molecular weight and good solubility of donor polymers for BHJ solar cells, in addition to a low band gap and a low HOMO energy level, in order to further enhance the device efficiencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coffin, R. C., Peet, J., Rogers, J., & Bazan, G. C. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.403 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Price, S. C., Stuart, A. C., Yang, L., Zhou, H., & You, W. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja1112595 · Cited by 1,505
Self-citationDuan, C., Huang, F., & Cao, Y. (2012) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c2jm30470h · Cited by 498
Chochos, C. L., & Choulis, S. A. (2011) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.04.003 · Cited by 340
A Weak Donor−Strong Acceptor Strategy to Design Ideal Polymers for Organic Solar Cells
Zhou, H., Yang, L., Stoneking, S., & You, W. (2010) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am1000344 · Cited by 275
Self-citationBian, L., Zhu, E., Tang, J., Tang, W., & Zhang, F. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.03.001 · Cited by 269
Li, W., Yang, L., Tumbleston, J. R., Yan, L., Ade, H., & You, W. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201305251 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, H., Yang, L., Xiao, S., Liu, S., & You, W.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-29
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 811-820
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2024377764
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.