The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bilayer Morphologies of Self-Assembled Crew-Cut Aggregates of Amphiphilic PS-b-PEO Diblock Copolymers in Solution
Abstract
A wide range of bilayer aggregates, among them tubules, vesicles, large compound vesicles (LCVs), and lamellae, were prepared from various polystyrene- b -poly(ethylene oxide) (PS- b -PEO) diblock copolymers, and studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The preparation method involved copolymer dissolution in DMF at room temperature, followed by the addition of water. In addition, it was found that aggregates of various morphologies can be prepared from an identical block copolymer by changing the solvent from DMF to a water−DMF mixture, by the addition of electrolytes, or by the use of subambient temperatures. All of these methods can be used to facilitate the formation of specific bilayer aggregates. When the preparation method involved copolymer dissolution in water−DMF mixtures, it was found that the morphologies of aggregates under certain conditions also depended on the annealing time. For example, the ratio of tubules to vesicles is related to the annealing time; only tubules appear at long annealing times, while vesicles and tubules coexist at short annealing times. Possible mechanisms for the formation of the bilayers are discussed. Tubules with oscillatory perturbations in their diameters are seen; these might be intermediates in the vesicle to tubule transition. Lamellae are observed frequently in the present system. In addition, bent lamellae have been observed for the first time; they may be intermediates in the lamella to vesicle transition, as suggested by some theories dealing with small molecule amphiphiles. The present system is believed to be the first to yield stable block copolymer amphiphile tubules, as well more complex tubular or vesicular aggregates, such as “plumber's nightmare”, starfishlike vesicles, budding vesicles (i.e. a chain of vesicles), and vesicles consisting of one or more small internalized vesicles within a larger one. Some of the morphologies are biomimetic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhang, L., & Eisenberg, A. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja953709s · Cited by 1,262
Self-citation
Cited by
Blanazs, A., Armes, S. P., & Ryan, A. J. (2009) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200800713 · Cited by 1,500
Nano-engineering block copolymer aggregates for drug delivery
Allen, C., Maysinger, D., & Eisenberg, A. (1999) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/s0927-7765(99)00058-2 · Cited by 1,358
Self-citationAdvances and challenges in smart and functional polymer vesicles
Du, J., & O'Reilly, R. K. (2009) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b905635a · Cited by 572
Block copolymer vesicles—using concepts from polymer chemistry to mimic biomembranes
Kita-Tokarczyk, K., Grumelard, J., Haefele, T., & Meier, W. (2005) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.083 · Cited by 517
Block Copolymers as a Tool for Nanomaterial Fabrication
Lazzari, M., & López‐Quintela, M. A. (2003) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200300382 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, K., & Eisenberg, A.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-05-12
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3509-3518
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W1974888898
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.