Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surface Interaction Forces of Well-Defined, High-Density Polymer Brushes Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy. 1. Effect of Chain Length

Yamamoto, Shinpei, Ejaz, Muhammad, Tsujii, Yoshinobu, Matsumoto, Mutsuo, Fukuda, Takeshi·2000·Macromolecules

Abstract

We made direct force measurements by atomic force microscopy (AFM) at surfaces of polymer brushes comprised of low-polydispersity poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) chains densely end-grafted on a silicon substrate by living radical polymerization. These brushes are characterized by an exceptionally high, nearly constant graft density (approximately 0.4 chains/nm 2 ) and a wide range of molecular weights of the graft chains. This graft density is at least 10 times larger than those of the previously studied polymer brushes prepared by the adsorption of block copolymers. Force measurements were made in toluene with a silica particle-attached cantilever. The hysteresis behavior of a piezo actuator used in the AFM was corrected by simultaneously measuring its piezo current. The true distance D between the substrate surface and the silica probe, which usually is difficult to define in AFM experiments, was successfully determined by AFM imaging across the boundary of a scratched and an unscratched region on the sample surface. In this way, we could obtain quantitative force−distance profiles. The repulsive force was observed to rapidly increase with decreasing separation. The equilibrium thickness L e of the brushes, i.e., the critical distance at which a repulsive force was detectable, was found to be proportional to the weight-average chain contour length L c,w, giving L e / L c,w = 0.6. This indicates formation of a homogeneous polymer layer with highly stretched graft chains. Unlike the previously reported results for lower density polymer brushes, the force−distance profiles for different graft chain lengths were not scaled by the reduced distance D/L e . Longer brushes were more resistant to compression: for example, the longest studied brush was compressible only to D/L e = 0.8, which was about 3 times as large as the scaled dry thickness L d /L e .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma991733a

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Yamamoto, S., Ejaz, M., Tsujii, Y., Matsumoto, M., & Fukuda, T.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
33
Issue
15
Pages
5602-5607
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2008271275
Cited by
229
References
2
FWCI
6.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.