The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surface Interaction Forces of Well-Defined, High-Density Polymer Brushes Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy. 2. Effect of Graft Density
Abstract
Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) brushes with the same chain length but different graft densities were prepared on a silicon substrate by the surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization technique. The graft density σ was changed in a wide range extending to an exceptionally high value (0.07 < σ (chains/nm 2 ) < 0.7) by photodecomposing the surface-fixed initiator, 2-(4-cholorosulfonylphenyl)ethyltrichlorosilane (CTCS). The surface density σ i of CTCS was determined by the grazing-angle reflection−absorption FT-IR measurement. The comparison of σ and σ i suggests that there is a limiting value in σ that cannot be exceeded even if σ i is increased. The direct force measurements were made at the brush surface swollen in toluene by an atomic force microscope with a silica particle-attached cantilever. The analysis of the obtained force−distance profiles revealed that the equilibrium thickness L e scaled by the full chain length L c varies such as L e / L c ∝ σ n with n increasing from about 0.3 to 0.5 with increasing σ and that the brush with a higher σ is more resistant to compression. These results are poorly explained by the scaling theory, which was derived for “moderately dense” brushes. This suggests that the studied σ range is in the “high-density” regime, in which higher-order interactions among graft chains are important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, J.-S., & Matyjaszewski, K. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00125a035 · Cited by 4,622
Kato, M., Kamigaito, M., Sawamoto, M., & Higashimura, T. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00109a056 · Cited by 3,046
Cited by
Barbey, R., Lavanant, L., Paripovic, D., Schüwer, N., Sugnaux, C., Tugulu, S., & Klok, H.-A. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900045a · Cited by 1,753
Murata, H., Koepsel, R. R., Matyjaszewski, K., & Russell, A. J. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.012 · Cited by 722
Hui, C. M., Pietrasik, J., Schmitt, M., Mahoney, C., Choi, J., Bockstaller, M. R., & Matyjaszewski, K. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm4023634 · Cited by 367
Tsujii, Y., Ejaz, M., Sato, K., Goto, A., & Fukuda, T. (2001) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma010733j · Cited by 310
Self-citationKobayashi, M., Terayama, Y., Hosaka, N., Kaido, M., Suzuki, A., Yamada, N., Torikai, N., Ishihara, K., & Takahara, A. (2007) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b615780g · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamamoto, S., Ejaz, M., Tsujii, Y., & Fukuda, T.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5608-5612
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W4252572592
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.