Nanotheranostics and image-guided drug delivery: current concepts and future directions
Abstract
Nanomedicine formulations aim to improve the biodistribution and the target site accumulation of systemically applied (chemo-) therapeutics. Various different passively and actively targeted nanomedicines have been evaluated over the years, based e.g. on liposomes, polymers, micelles and antibodies, and a significant amount of (pre-) clinical evidence has been obtained showing that these 5-200 nm sized carrier materials are able to improve the therapeutic index of low-molecular-weight drugs. Besides for therapeutic purposes, however, nanomedicine formulations have also been more and more used for imaging applications, as well as, in recent years, for theranostic approaches, i.e. for systems and strategies in which disease diagnosis and therapy are combined. Potential applications of theranostic nanomedicine formulations range from the noninvasive assessment of the biodistribution and the target site accumulation of low-molecular-weight drugs, and the visualization of drug distribution and drug release at the target site, to the optimization of strategies relying on triggered drug release, and the prediction and real-time monitoring of therapeutic responses. Nanotheranostic systems are consequently considered to be highly suitable systems for (pre-) clinical implementation, not only because they might assist in better understanding various important aspects of the drug delivery process, and in developing better drug delivery systems, but also because they might contribute to realizing the potential of "personalized medicine", and to developing more effective and less toxic treatment regimens for individual patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Theranostic nanoparticles provide a useful tool to gain knowledge about biodistribution and target site accumulation, and thus help to preselect patients and predict therapy responses.
“Theranostic nanoparticles provide a useful tool to gain knowledge about biodistribution and target site accumulation, and thus help to preselect patients and predict therapy responses [244].”
From Iron oxide nanoparticles: Diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications (2019) · cites this paper as [244]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 397
- Authors
- Lammers, T., Kiessling, F., Hennink, W. E., & Storm, G.
- Affiliations
- German Cancer Research Center (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lammers, Twan
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmaceutics
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-10-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1899-1912
- ISSN
- 1543-8384 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-8392
- OpenAlex
- W1995024863
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanotechnology research and applications
- Keywords
- nanotheranostics, image-guided drug delivery, drug biodistribution, liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, micelles, antibody-drug conjugates, triggered drug release, personalized medicine, drug delivery systems
- MeSH terms
- Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanomedicine, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review