The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative 1H NMR Analysis of Chemical Stabilities in Anion-Exchange Membranes
Abstract
We compared the alkaline stability of three classes of anion exchange membranes that are leading candidates for applications in platinum-free fuel cells. A methodology is presented for the study of chemical stability of anion-exchange polymers in alkaline media that provides clear and quantitative 1 H NMR spectroscopic data of dissolved polymers containing benzyltrimethylammonium functionalities. Recent studies have investigated the stabilities of benzimidazolium- and alkylimidazolium-bearing polymers using periodic 1 H NMR sampling. These studies included varying alkaline concentrations, external heating sources, and excessive processing and contained no internal standard for absolute measurements. Key aspects of our time-resolved 1 H NMR method include in situ heating and sampling within the spectrometer, fixed stoichiometric relationships between the benzyltrimethylammonium functionalities of each polymer and potassium deuteroxide (KOD), and the incorporation of an internal standard for the absolute measurement of the polymer degradation. In addition, our method permits the identification of the degradation products to find the underlying cause of chemical lability. Our results demonstrate that a styrene-based polymer containing benzyltrimethylammonium functional groups is remarkably stable when exposed to 20 equivalents per cation of KOD at 80 °C with a half-life ( t 1/2 ) of 231 h. Under these standard conditions, functionalized poly(phenylene oxide) and poly(arylene ether sulfone) copolymers, both bearing benzyltrimethylammonium functionalities were found to degrade with a half-lives of 57.8 and 2.7 h, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems
Varcoe, J. R., Atanassov, P., Dekel, D. R., Herring, A. M., Hickner, M. A., Kohl, P. A., Kucernak, A. R., Mustain, W. E., Nijmeijer, K., Scott, K., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c4ee01303d · Cited by 2,051
Self-citationReview of cell performance in anion exchange membrane fuel cells
Dekel, D. R. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.07.117 · Cited by 1,069
Electrocatalysis in Alkaline Media and Alkaline Membrane-Based Energy Technologies
Yang, Y., Peltier, C. R., Zeng, R., Schimmenti, R., Li, Q., Huang, X., Yan, Z., Potsi, G., Selhorst, R., Lu, X., et al. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00331 · Cited by 544
Hugar, K. M., Kostalik, H. A., & Coates, G. W. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b02879 · Cited by 465
Anion exchange membranes: Current status and moving forward
Hickner, M. A., Herring, A. M., & Coughlin, E. B. (2013) · Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics · doi:10.1002/polb.23395 · Cited by 423
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nuñez, S. A., & Hickner, M. A.
- Venue
- ACS Macro Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-12-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-52
- ISSN
- 2161-1653 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2314950783
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative 1H NMR Analysis of Chemical Stabilities in Anion-Exchange Membranes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/mz300486h
- The paper
- Nuñez, S. A., & Hickner, M. A. (2013). Quantitative 1H NMR Analysis of Chemical Stabilities in Anion-Exchange Membranes. ACS Macro Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/mz300486h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.