Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative Analysis of Optical Spectra from Individual Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes

Hagen, Axel, Hertel, Tobias·2003·Nano Letters

Abstract

We discuss how tight-binding band-structure calculations with a chirality- and diameter-dependent nearest-neighbor hopping integral may be used to relate well resolved features in the UV-VIS-NIR spectra of individual single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) to electronic excitations in specific tube types. The assignment of ( n, m ) indices to interband transitions in specific tube types can support a quantitative analysis of absorption spectra which may eventually be used for rapid screening and optimization of sample composition during SWNT synthesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl020237o

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Hagen, A., & Hertel, T.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2003-01-29
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
383-388
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2993001482
Cited by
219
References
1
FWCI
16.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.