Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Doping of Graphene

Open access
Wehling, T. O., Novoselov, K. S., Morozov, S. V., Vdovin, E. E., Katsnelson, M. I., Geim, A. K., Lichtenstein, A. I.·2008·Nano Letters

Abstract

Graphene is considered as one of the most promising materials for post silicon electronics, as it combines high electron mobility with atomic thickness [Novoselov et al. Science 2004, 306, 666-669. Novoselov et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 10451-10453]. The possibility of chemical doping and related excellent chemical sensor properties of graphene have been demonstrated experimentally [Schedin et al. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 652-655], but a microscopic understanding of these effects has been lacking, so far. In this letter, we present the first joint experimental and theoretical investigation of adsorbate-induced doping of graphene. A general relation between the doping strength and whether adsorbates are open- or closed-shell systems is demonstrated with the NO2 system: The single, open shell NO2 molecule is found to be a strong acceptor, whereas its closed shell dimer N2O4 causes only weak doping. This effect is pronounced by graphene's peculiar density of states (DOS), which provides an ideal situation for model studies of doping effects in semiconductors. We show that this DOS is ideal for "chemical sensor" applications and explain the recently observed [Schedin et al. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 652-655] NO2 single molecule detection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl072364w

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,129

Metadata

Authors
Wehling, T. O., Novoselov, K. S., Morozov, S. V., Vdovin, E. E., Katsnelson, M. I., Geim, A. K., & Lichtenstein, A. I.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2007-12-18
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
173-177
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2161928223
Cited by
1,129
References
3
FWCI
26.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.