The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engineering the Temporal Response of Photoconductive Photodetectors via Selective Introduction of Surface Trap States
Abstract
Photoconductive photodetectors fabricated using simple solution-processing have recently been shown to exhibit high gains (>1000) and outstanding sensitivities ( D* > 10(13) Jones). One ostensible disadvantage of exploiting photoconductive gain is that the temporal response is limited by the release of carriers from trap states. Here we show that it is possible to introduce specific chemical species onto the surfaces of colloidal quantum dots to produce only a single, desired trap state having a carefully selected lifetime. In this way we demonstrate a device that exhibits an attractive photoconductive gain (>10) combined with a response time ( approximately 25 ms) useful in imaging. We achieve this by preserving a single surface species, lead sulfite, while eliminating lead sulfate and lead carboxylate. In doing so we preserve the outstanding sensitivity of these devices, achieving a specific detectivity of 10(12) Jones in the visible, while generating a temporal response suited to imaging applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hybrid graphene–quantum dot phototransistors with ultrahigh gain
Konstantatos, G., Badioli, M., Gaudreau, L., Osmond, J., Bernechea, M., de Arquer, F. P. G., Gatti, F., & Koppens, F. H. L. (2012) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.60 · Cited by 2,315
Self-citationSolution-processed semiconductors for next-generation photodetectors
García de Arquer, F. P., Armin, A., Meredith, P., & Sargent, E. H. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.100 · Cited by 1,529
Self-citationColloidal PbS Quantum Dot Solar Cells with High Fill Factor
Zhao, N., Osedach, T. P., Chang, L.-Y., Geyer, S. M., Wanger, D., Binda, M. T., Arango, A. C., Bawendi, M. G., & Bulovic, V. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn100129j · Cited by 454
Colloidal quantum dot electronics
Liu, M., Yazdani, N., Yarema, M., Jansen, M., Wood, V., & Sargent, E. H. (2021) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00632-7 · Cited by 448
Self-citationTang, J., Brzozowski, L., Barkhouse, D. A. R., Wang, X., Debnath, R., Wolowiec, R., Palmiano, E., Levina, L., Pattantyus-Abraham, A. G., Jamakosmanovic, D., et al. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn901564q · Cited by 392
Self-citationInfrared photovoltaics made by solution processing
Sargent, E. H. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.89 · Cited by 351
Self-citationSensitive Solution-Processed Bi2S3 Nanocrystalline Photodetectors
Konstantatos, G., Levina, L., Tang, J., & Sargent, E. H. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl802600z · Cited by 302
Self-citationLee, W., Liu, Y., Lee, Y., Sharma, B. K., Shinde, S. M., Kim, S. D., Nan, K., Yan, Z., Han, M., Huang, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03870-0 · Cited by 257
Monodisperse Palladium Sulfide as Efficient Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Du, C., Li, P., Yang, F., Cheng, G., Chen, S., & Luo, W. (2018) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b16359 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Konstantatos, G., Levina, L., Fischer, A., & Sargent, E. H.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-04-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1446-1450
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2082355876
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
