The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA Translocation through Graphene Nanopores
Abstract
We report on DNA translocations through nanopores created in graphene membranes. Devices consist of 1-5 nm thick graphene membranes with electron-beam sculpted nanopores from 5 to 10 nm in diameter. Due to the thin nature of the graphene membranes, we observe larger blocked currents than for traditional solid-state nanopores. However, ionic current noise levels are several orders of magnitude larger than those for silicon nitride nanopores. These fluctuations are reduced with the atomic-layer deposition of 5 nm of titanium dioxide over the device. Unlike traditional solid-state nanopore materials that are insulating, graphene is an excellent electrical conductor. Use of graphene as a membrane material opens the door to a new class of nanopore devices in which electronic sensing and control are performed directly at the pore.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films
Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., Grigorieva, I. V., & Firsov, A. A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1102896 · Cited by 66,834
Cited by
Electrochemistry of Graphene and Related Materials
Ambrosi, A., Chua, C. K., Bonanni, A., & Pumera, M. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500023c · Cited by 1,208
2D materials as an emerging platform for nanopore-based power generation
Macha, M., Marion, S., Nandigana, V. V. R., & Radenovic, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0126-z · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Merchant, C. A., Healy, K., Wanunu, M., Ray, V., Peterman, N., Bartel, J., Fischbein, M. D., Venta, K., Luo, Z., Johnson, A. T. C., & Drndić, M.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-07-23
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2915-2921
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W3030856093
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
