The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stability of DNA Origami Nanoarrays in Cell Lysate
Open accessAbstract
Scaffolded DNA origami, a method to create self-assembled nanostructures with spatially addressable features, has recently been used to develop water-soluble molecular chips for label-free RNA detection, platforms for deterministic protein positioning, and single molecule reaction observatories. These applications highlight the possibility of exploiting the unique properties and biocompatibility of DNA nanostructures in live, cellular systems. Herein, we assembled several DNA origami nanostructures of differing shape, size and probes, and investigated their interaction with lysate obtained from various normal and cancerous cell lines. We separated and analyzed the origami-lysate mixtures using agarose gel electrophoresis and recovered the DNA structures for functional assay and subsequent microscopic examination. Our results demonstrate that DNA origami nanostructures are stable in cell lysate and can be easily separated from lysate mixtures, in contrast to natural, single- and double-stranded DNA. Atomic force microscope (AFM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images show that the DNA origami structures are fully intact after separation from cell lysates and hybridize to their targets, verifying the superior structural integrity and functionality of self-assembled DNA origami nanostructures relative to conventional oligonucleotides. The stability and functionality of DNA origami structures in cell lysate validate their use for biological applications, for example, as programmable molecular rafts or disease detection platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chaotic Mixer for Microchannels
Stroock, A. D., Dertinger, S. K. W., Ajdari, A., Mezić, I., Stone, H. A., & Whitesides, G. M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066238 · Cited by 3,435
Cited by
Seeman, N. C., & Sleiman, H. F. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.68 · Cited by 1,875
Challenges and opportunities for structural DNA nanotechnology
Pinheiro, A. V., Han, D., Shih, W. M., & Yan, H. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.187 · Cited by 1,292
Self-citationDNA nanotechnology from the test tube to the cell
Chen, Y.-J., Groves, B., Muscat, R. A., & Seelig, G. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.195 · Cited by 594
DNA Functional Materials Assembled from Branched DNA: Design, Synthesis, and Applications
Dong, Y., Yao, C., Zhu, Y., Yang, L., Luo, D., & Yang, D. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00294 · Cited by 533
Virus-Inspired Membrane Encapsulation of DNA Nanostructures To Achieve In Vivo Stability
Perrault, S. D., & Shih, W. M. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn5011914 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Mei, Q., Wei, X., Su, F., Liu, Y., Youngbull, C., Johnson, R., Lindsay, S., Yan, H., & Meldrum, D.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1477-1482
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2084835951
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of DNA Origami Nanoarrays in Cell Lysate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nl1040836
- The paper
- Mei, Q., Wei, X., Su, F., Liu, Y., Youngbull, C., Johnson, R., Lindsay, S., Yan, H., & Meldrum, D. (2011). Stability of DNA Origami Nanoarrays in Cell Lysate. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl1040836
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.