The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strong Two-Photon-Induced Fluorescence from Photostable, Biocompatible Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Cellular and Deep-Tissue Imaging
Abstract
Bright two-photon fluorescent probes are highly desirable to be able to optically probe biological activities deep inside living organisms with larger imaging depth, minor autofluorescence background, and less photodamage. In this study, we report the biocompatible nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (N-GQDs) as efficient two-photon fluorescent probes for cellular and deep-tissue imaging. The N-GQD was prepared by a facile solvothermal method using dimethylformamide as a solvent and nitrogen source. The two-photon absorption cross-section of N-GQD reaches 48,000 Göppert-Mayer units, which far surpasses that of the organic dyes and is comparable to that of the high performance semiconductor QDs, achieving the highest value ever reported for carbon-based nanomaterials. More importantly, a study of penetration depth in tissue phantom demonstrates that the N-GQD can achieve a large imaging depth of 1800 μm, significantly extending the fundamental two-photon imaging depth limit. In addition, the N-GQD is nontoxic to living cells and exhibits super photostability under repeated laser irradiation. The high two-photon absorption cross-section, large imaging depth, good biocompatibility, and extraordinary photostability render the N-GQD an attractive alternative probe for efficient two-photon imaging in biological and biomedical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Welsher, K., Sherlock, S. P., & Dai, H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1014501108 · Cited by 958
Cited by
Glowing Graphene Quantum Dots and Carbon Dots: Properties, Syntheses, and Biological Applications
Zheng, X. T., Ananthanarayanan, A., Luo, K. Q., & Chen, P. (2015) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201402648 · Cited by 2,190
An overview of nanoparticles commonly used in fluorescent bioimaging
Wolfbeis, O. S. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00392f · Cited by 1,631
Carbon dots—Emerging light emitters for bioimaging, cancer therapy and optoelectronics
Hola, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Giannelis, E. P., Zboril, R., & Rogach, A. L. (2014) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.004 · Cited by 992
Shining carbon dots: Synthesis and biomedical and optoelectronic applications
Yuan, F., Li, S., Fan, Z., Meng, X., Fan, L., & Yang, S. (2016) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2016.08.006 · Cited by 746
Zhang, X., Xie, H., Liu, Z., Tan, C., Luo, Z., Li, H., Lin, J., Sun, L., Chen, W., Xu, Z., et al. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201409400 · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Q., Guo, B., Rao, Z., Zhang, B., & Gong, J. R.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-05-15
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2436-2441
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2089583950
- Cited by
- 958
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.