Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel Nanostructured Paper with Ultrahigh Transparency and Ultrahigh Haze for Solar Cells

Fang, Zhiqiang, Zhu, Hongli, Yuan, Yongbo, Ha, Dongheon, Zhu, Shuze, Preston, Colin, Chen, Qingxia, Li, Yuanyuan, Han, Xiaogang, Lee, Seongwoo, Chen, Gang, Li, Teng, Munday, Jeremy, Huang, Jinsong, Hu, Liangbing·2014·Nano Letters

Abstract

Solar cell substrates require high optical transparency but also prefer high optical haze to increase the light scattering and consequently the absorption in the active materials. Unfortunately, there is a trade-off between these optical properties, which is exemplified by common transparent paper substrates exhibiting a transparency of about 90% yet a low optical haze (<20%). In this work, we introduce a novel transparent paper made of wood fibers that displays both ultrahigh optical transparency (∼ 96%) and ultrahigh haze (∼ 60%), thus delivering an optimal substrate design for solar cell devices. Compared to previously demonstrated nanopaper composed of wood-based cellulose nanofibers, our novel transparent paper has better dual performance in transmittance and haze but also is fabricated at a much lower cost. This high-performance, low-cost transparent paper is a potentially revolutionary material that may influence a new generation of environmentally friendly printed electronics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl404101p

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Fang, Z., Zhu, H., Yuan, Y., Ha, D., Zhu, S., Preston, C., Chen, Q., Li, Y., Han, X., Lee, S., Chen, G., Li, T., Munday, J., Huang, J., & Hu, L.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2014-01-13
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
765-773
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2333125290
Cited by
489
References
5
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.