Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Trouble with TOPO; Identification of Adventitious Impurities Beneficial to the Growth of Cadmium Selenide Quantum Dots, Rods, and Wires

Wang, Fudong, Tang, Rui, Buhro, William E.·2008·Nano Letters

Abstract

Tri-n-octylphosphine oxide (TOPO) is a commonly used solvent for nanocrystal synthesis. Commercial TOPO samples contain varying amounts of phosphorus-containing impurities, some of which significantly influence nanocrystal growth. Consequently, nanocrystal syntheses often give irreproducible results with different batches of TOPO solvent. In this study, we identify TOPO impurities by (31)P NMR, and correlate their presence with the outcomes of CdSe nanocrystal syntheses. We subsequently add the active impurity species, one by one, to purified TOPO to confirm their influence on nanocrystal syntheses. In this manner, di-n-octylphosphine oxide (DOPO) is shown to assist CdSe quantum-dot growth; di-n-octylphosphinic acid (DOPA) and mono-n-octylphosphinic acid (MOPA) are shown to assist CdSe quantum-rod growth, and DOPA is shown to assist CdSe quantum-wire growth. (The TOPO impurity n-octylphosphonic acid, OPA, has been previously shown to assist quantum-rod growth.) The beneficial impurities are prepared on multigram scales and can be added to recrystallized TOPO to provide reproducible synthetic results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl801692g

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Wang, F., Tang, R., & Buhro, W. E.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2008-08-29
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
3521-3524
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2003748893
Cited by
188
References
1
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.